1976
DOI: 10.5636/jgg.28.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new interpretation of magnetic field variation associated with the Matsushiro earthquakes.

Abstract: Local magnetic field variation observed during the Matsushiro earthquake swarm in central Honshu, Japan, is well correlated with the variation of spring-water outflow but not with that of the seismic activity. This indicates that the origin of the magnetic field variation is not the stress-induced piezomagnetic effect but may be the water-induced electrokinetic effect proposed by MIzuTANI et al. (1975). The electrokinetic effect combined with the observed amount of water discharge is found to give the correct … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although presented models seem to explain some specific aspects of the ULF observations, no complete theory is so far available. There are at least three mechanisms which have been proposed for the generation of earth currents as sources of ULF emissions: (1) Electrokinetic effects (e.g., Mizutani and Ishido, 1976;Fitterman 1978Fitterman , 1979Fitterman , 1981Ishido and Mizutani 1981;Dobrovolsky et al 1989;Fenoglio et al 1995), (2) Induction effects (Draganov et al 1991;Surkov 1999), and (3) Microfracturing effects Hayakawa 1995, 1998). Fenoglio et al (1995) tried to explain the ULF geomagnetic properties associated with the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake by electrokinetic effects.…”
Section: Possible Physical Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although presented models seem to explain some specific aspects of the ULF observations, no complete theory is so far available. There are at least three mechanisms which have been proposed for the generation of earth currents as sources of ULF emissions: (1) Electrokinetic effects (e.g., Mizutani and Ishido, 1976;Fitterman 1978Fitterman , 1979Fitterman , 1981Ishido and Mizutani 1981;Dobrovolsky et al 1989;Fenoglio et al 1995), (2) Induction effects (Draganov et al 1991;Surkov 1999), and (3) Microfracturing effects Hayakawa 1995, 1998). Fenoglio et al (1995) tried to explain the ULF geomagnetic properties associated with the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake by electrokinetic effects.…”
Section: Possible Physical Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrokinetic phenomena are applicable in many geophysical research areas, including monitoring subsurface flows in oil reservoirs and in geothermal areas, and monitoring the activity of volcanoes. Mizutani et al (1976) first proposed a model in which during the dilatancy stage, which is assumed to precede earthquakes, pore pressure in the dilatant region decreases and water flows into this region from the surrounding area, generating electric and magnetic precursors to earthquakes due to electrokinetic effects. Since then, many models have been proposed (e.g., Corwin and Morrison 1977;Fitterman 1981;Revil et al 1999;Ishido and Pritchett 1999).…”
Section: Electrokinetic Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrokinetically generated electric and magnetic fields [Mizutani and Ishido, 1976;Fitterman, 1978Fitterman, , 1979 [Loeb, 1958]. Charge generation by rapid fluid disruption is thus a well-known phenomenon and is not, of much concern if this charge is generated in a conducting environment, since it will quickly decay [Locknet et al, 1983].…”
Section: Physical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%