2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1682-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new laboratory model using bull and boar spermatozoa and fluorescent beads to assess a membrane’s occlusive potential

Abstract: Convenient and rapid test procedures to evaluate membranes for regenerative procedures are still warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A custom-made two-chamber system, which has been validated in an earlier study [20], was used to monitor the tightness or penetration of the cells. It consists of an upper and a lower chamber, which could be separated by the test membranes.…”
Section: Cell Permeability Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A custom-made two-chamber system, which has been validated in an earlier study [20], was used to monitor the tightness or penetration of the cells. It consists of an upper and a lower chamber, which could be separated by the test membranes.…”
Section: Cell Permeability Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As cell growth under laboratory conditions is complex and time-consuming, while animal studies are expensive and raise additional ethical concerns, the use of simple surrogate cell assays to evaluate membrane permeability and occlusive capacity is still of great interest. Under this background, a new model has previously been introduced, in which bull and boar spermatozoa and fluorescent beads were used to assess and compare the cell occlusion potential of membranes [20]. This method allowed for convenient and rapid testing of cell and particle penetration, providing a solid basis for the screening of dental membranes after being exposed to different degradation durations and methods; however, the latter aspect was not considered in the previous study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%