1991
DOI: 10.1029/90jb01963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new Late Cretaceous paleomagnetic pole from the Adel Mountains, west central Montana

Abstract: North America's apparent polar wander path has been poorly defined between the mid‐Cretaceous and Paleocene reference pole positions. Existing data allowed 13° of apparent polar motion over about 22 m.y. (87–65 Ma) roughly coinciding with the beginning of Laramide deformation (∼80 Ma). We report on a paleomagnetic study of the Adel Mountain Volcanic rocks to refine the North American apparent polar wander path for this interval. The shonkinite rocks of the Adel Mountain Volcanic field are on the eastern edge o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make paleogeographic interpretations, we must compare this pole to the reference pole for cratonic North America. Following a relatively long period with little or no apparent polar wander , the Upper Cretaceous is marked by a quick but poorly constrained jump of about 11°in pole position (for discussion see Gunderson and Sheriff 1991;and Diehl 1991). Following Wynne et al (1992, their Marquis and Globerman (1988), due in part to the difference in the reference field calculations and in part to the slightly shallower combined mean inclination.…”
Section: Northward Displacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make paleogeographic interpretations, we must compare this pole to the reference pole for cratonic North America. Following a relatively long period with little or no apparent polar wander , the Upper Cretaceous is marked by a quick but poorly constrained jump of about 11°in pole position (for discussion see Gunderson and Sheriff 1991;and Diehl 1991). Following Wynne et al (1992, their Marquis and Globerman (1988), due in part to the difference in the reference field calculations and in part to the slightly shallower combined mean inclination.…”
Section: Northward Displacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some of the North American data used have declination uncertainties (16) that are an important consideration in the comparison presented by Sager and Koppers (1). The North American data cited (1), however, lack the temporal resolution to test the hypothesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the possibility of whole-scale, postemplacement deformation involving rotation or tilt (or a combination of both) of the Philipsburg Batholith, the grand mean was compared to expected paleofi eld directions (Table 6) calculated from different paleomagnetic pole compilations for the Late Cretaceous (Besse and Courtillot, 2003;Gunderson and Sheriff, 1991;Van der Voo, 1993) for North America (Fig. 21).…”
Section: Timing Of Emplacement and Sevier Foldand-thrust Belt Developmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contours of foliation dips show an overall pattern of shallow values in the Dora Thorn Pluton, except near the estimated subsurface location of the Georgetown-Princeton thrust and near the eastern margin of the intrusion. Near intrusion margins, foliation dips N 015.1°3 52.1°3 51.1°P hilipsburg Batholith grand mean Besse and Courtillot (2003) Gunderson and Sheriff (1991) Van der Voo (1993) range from shallow to steep, yet all foliation strikes are parallel to margins. Subhorizontal AMS lineations are roughly parallel to foliation strike and to batholith margins, and they are interpreted as stretching lineations due to magma fl ow impinging on wall-rock contacts.…”
Section: Emplacement Of the Philipsburg Batholithmentioning
confidence: 99%