2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2014.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new Late Triassic age for the Puesto Viejo Group (San Rafael depocenter, Argentina): SHRIMP U–Pb zircon dating and biostratigraphic correlations across southern Gondwana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposed explanation brings together data considered thus far puzzling and contradictory, and is compatible with recent observations in other long-lived arc to postorogenic systems that show protracted zircon recycling (Pereira et al 2014). Our observations support recent evidence from South America that the absolute ages assigned to Gondwanan biozones may be erroneously old (Ottone et al 2014). Our new data are in agreement with all recently published ages (Fildani et al 2007(Fildani et al , 2009Lanci et al 2013;Rubidge et al 2013) and demonstrate the importance of considering the magmatic history of a volcanic source when interpreting U-Pb zircon datasets from tuffs to estimate maximum depositional ages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our proposed explanation brings together data considered thus far puzzling and contradictory, and is compatible with recent observations in other long-lived arc to postorogenic systems that show protracted zircon recycling (Pereira et al 2014). Our observations support recent evidence from South America that the absolute ages assigned to Gondwanan biozones may be erroneously old (Ottone et al 2014). Our new data are in agreement with all recently published ages (Fildani et al 2007(Fildani et al , 2009Lanci et al 2013;Rubidge et al 2013) and demonstrate the importance of considering the magmatic history of a volcanic source when interpreting U-Pb zircon datasets from tuffs to estimate maximum depositional ages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…While this age range could be due to mixing of different age domains within individual zircon grains during analysis, analytical uncertainty, or Pb-loss (Castiñeiras et al 2010), magma system evolution is complex and commonly recycles older zircon into later eruption/emplacement events and some individual plutons have been resolved to be emplaced over a period of >10 Ma (Coleman et al 2004;Miller et al 2007;Schwartz et al 2014). The suspected volcanic sources, the Choiyoi and Puesto Viejo igneous suites, are known to have large populations of recycled zircon (Spalletti et al 2008;Domeier et al 2011;Ottone et al 2014). We therefore interpret this range to represent mixing of the zircon age population based on (1) high MSWD (1.6-17) of the weighted mean for Permian/Permo-Triassic zircon populations (Miller et al 2007;Compston and Gallagher 2012); (2) lack of inherited cores interpreted from catholuminescence images; (3) the reproducibility of ages between several grains (s ≥ 3); (4) concordance of the analyses; and (5) known history of the volcanic system.…”
Section: U-pb Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cynognathus crateronotus and Diademodon tetragonus have been widely-utilized in biostratigraphic correlations, since they achieved a broad Gondwanan distribution (Argentina, South Africa, Namibia, Zambia, Antarctica) during the Triassic and are relatively abundant in the fossil record [8, 10, 109, 110, 112]. Based upon the new radiometric dating from San Rafael Group and the traditionally older inferred age of the Cynognathus AZ of the Karoo (although see [113]), Ottone et al [106] suggested two possible scenarios: (a) that the classical Cynognathus AZ of South Africa is much younger than previously thought or (b) that the biochron of Cynognathus and Diademodon is longer than previously thought, and thus their records in Argentina reflect the persistence of this fauna for nearly 20 million years. Both of these scenarios are highly problematic for Triassic faunal correlation (Fig 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%