2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Leptoceratopsid (Ornithischia, Ceratopsia) with a Unique Ischium from the Upper Cretaceous of Shandong Province, China

Abstract: The partial skeleton of a leptoceratopsid dinosaur, Ischioceratops zhuchengensis gen. et sp. nov., was excavated from the bone-beds of the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi Group of Zhucheng, Shandong Province, China. This fossil represents the second leptoceratopsid dinosaur specimen recovered from the Kugou locality, a highly productive site in Zhucheng. The ischium of the new taxon is morphologically unique among known Dinosauria, flaring gradually to form an obturator process in its middle portion and resembling th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2008) branch smoothing algorithm for adjusting zero‐length branches leads to very deep branches subtending each species of protoceratopsid (~20 million years) and also Liaoceratops (>10 million years). Ongoing studies on basal neoceratopsian diversity (He et al., 2015; Morshhauser, You, Li, & Dodson, 2019) and ages and correlations of Asian Late Cretaceous red beds (Dashzeveg et al, 2005; Fanti, Currie, & Badamgarav, 2012) suggest that turnover among protoceratopsids may have occurred more rapidly within the Campano‐Maastrichtian (Makovicky, 2008). We therefore also generated ancestral ontogenetic vectors from optimizations on a tree in which branches without implied ghost lineage durations were corrected in Mesquite by addition of 1 million years, representing a punctuated model of evolution, to assess how sensitive resulting ontogenetic vectors are to branch lengths in the tree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2008) branch smoothing algorithm for adjusting zero‐length branches leads to very deep branches subtending each species of protoceratopsid (~20 million years) and also Liaoceratops (>10 million years). Ongoing studies on basal neoceratopsian diversity (He et al., 2015; Morshhauser, You, Li, & Dodson, 2019) and ages and correlations of Asian Late Cretaceous red beds (Dashzeveg et al, 2005; Fanti, Currie, & Badamgarav, 2012) suggest that turnover among protoceratopsids may have occurred more rapidly within the Campano‐Maastrichtian (Makovicky, 2008). We therefore also generated ancestral ontogenetic vectors from optimizations on a tree in which branches without implied ghost lineage durations were corrected in Mesquite by addition of 1 million years, representing a punctuated model of evolution, to assess how sensitive resulting ontogenetic vectors are to branch lengths in the tree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). Despite their stratigraphic and geographic proximity, Leptoceratops and Montanoceratops are not recovered as close relatives in recent phylogenetic analyses in this analysis or by He et al (2015) and preceding versions of that matrix.…”
Section: Results Of the Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The phylogenetic analysis of the He et al (2015) modified matrix recovered most parsimonious trees, each with a tree length of 328, a consistency index of 0.60, a retention index of 0.80, and a best tree-bisection reconnection score of 326 (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Results Of the Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Simplified cladograms showing interrelationships within: ( A ) Dinosauria plus Silesauridae, ( B ) Ornithischia, and ( C ) Maniraptoriformes. Phylogenetic topology and nomenclature reflect an informal consensus synthesized from various sources, including Carrano and Sampson (), Wilson and Upchurch (), Martinez et al (), Carrano et al (), Han et al (), Choiniere et al (), Foth et al (), McPhee et al (), Boyd (), He et al () and Norman ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%