2011
DOI: 10.1179/sea.2011.30.1.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Look at Kincaid: Magnetic Survey of a Large Mississippian Town

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigators have traditionally used vertical two-dimensional GPR profiles (Garrison, 1998;Welch et al, 2006;Pluckhahn et al, 2010;Thompson et al, 2011), and more recently electrical resistivity pseudo-sections (Monaghan and Peebles, 2010;Kassabaum et al, 2014) and down-hole magnetic susceptibility (McNutt et al, 2012;Rodning et al, 2013;Kassasbaum et al, 2014) to understand internal mound structure and to interpret the sequence of mound construction episodes. Others have demonstrated the utility of magnetic gradiometry in locating subsurface structural remains on a mound's final summit (Butler et al, 2011;King et al, 2011). Some investigators in other parts of the world have experimented with GPR time-slices to create horizontal maps of successive mound-use episodes, identify buried tombs and reconstruct mound manufacturing techniques, with varying degrees of success (Kamei et al, 2000;Campana et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators have traditionally used vertical two-dimensional GPR profiles (Garrison, 1998;Welch et al, 2006;Pluckhahn et al, 2010;Thompson et al, 2011), and more recently electrical resistivity pseudo-sections (Monaghan and Peebles, 2010;Kassabaum et al, 2014) and down-hole magnetic susceptibility (McNutt et al, 2012;Rodning et al, 2013;Kassasbaum et al, 2014) to understand internal mound structure and to interpret the sequence of mound construction episodes. Others have demonstrated the utility of magnetic gradiometry in locating subsurface structural remains on a mound's final summit (Butler et al, 2011;King et al, 2011). Some investigators in other parts of the world have experimented with GPR time-slices to create horizontal maps of successive mound-use episodes, identify buried tombs and reconstruct mound manufacturing techniques, with varying degrees of success (Kamei et al, 2000;Campana et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 650 CE, Kincaid was repopulated during the Late Woodland Lewis phase, which transitioned into the Mississippian period sometime between 1000 and 1150 CE (Pursell, 2016). The Mississippian occupation (1150-1450 CE) is the best studied at Kincaid because large earthworks, bastioned fortifications, and an extensive village were constructed during this time (Butler et al, 2011). Between 1400 and 1450 CE, Mississippians abandoned Kincaid, along with much of the central Mississippi and Ohio River valleys (Cobb and Butler, 2002;Milner and Chaplin, 2010), in what has been suggested to be a response to a severe ∼100-yrlong drought between 1350 and 1450 CE (Bird et al, 2017).…”
Section: Study Site and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we present new data from Avery Lake, a floodplain lake located directly adjacent to the Kincaid Mounds archaeological site in southern Illinois, USA (Bird et al, 2019;Butler et al, 2011). Specifically, we used geochemical and isotopic methods to quantify Pb pollution and its provenance through time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mississippian archaeology, which spans the centuries before European contact in the southeastern USA, can be greatly enhanced by prospection techniques (e.g. see Bigman et al ., ; Butler et al ., ; Hargrave, ; Lockhart et al ., ). Although archaeological features on many North American sites are subtle, Mississippian features tend to be prominent, producing high‐contrast geophysical signatures – especially magnetically (Johnson et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%