1999
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new look at the 3:1 rule of combat through Markov Stochastic Lanchester models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This law states that if red has N times the initial force size of blue, then blue needs a skill rate N 2 times red's skill rate in order for the deterministic model to predict a draw. We call this scenario the Parity Point scenario and use a value of N ¼ 3, as is often used in the literature (Kress andTalmor 1999, McNaught 1999). We anticipate the probability of red winning being around 0.5.…”
Section: Results and Implications For Stochastic Lanchester Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This law states that if red has N times the initial force size of blue, then blue needs a skill rate N 2 times red's skill rate in order for the deterministic model to predict a draw. We call this scenario the Parity Point scenario and use a value of N ¼ 3, as is often used in the literature (Kress andTalmor 1999, McNaught 1999). We anticipate the probability of red winning being around 0.5.…”
Section: Results and Implications For Stochastic Lanchester Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way SLMs can be studied is by varying the parameters to estimate the probability that one side (say, red) wins under various conditions (for an example, see Kress and Talmor (1999)). We will use IBS to assess the effect of changing the parameters within a simulation run on the probability that a certain side wins.…”
Section: Interval-based Simulation To Model Input Uncertainty In Stocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the inter-detection and the attack times are exponentially distributed random variables with parameters λ and µ , respectively. While the former is a reasonable assumption based on the independent and memory-less nature of the search process (see Section 4 below), the latter is an approximation, which is similar to the exponential inter-firing assumption in stochastic duel or stochastic Lanchester models (e.g., Kress (1991) and Kress and Talmor (1999) …”
Section: The Basic Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stream of works extended the Lanchester models-which are deterministic in nature-to stochastic duel models by introducing randomness to shot outcomes, time between taking shots, etc. ; see, for instance, Brown (1963); Williams and Ancker (1963); Barfoot (1974); Kress (1992); and Kress and Talmor (1999). These stochastic duel models, however, assume homogeneous units, so there is no decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%