Methods in Protein Sequence Analysis 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5832-2_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Low Cost, Fully Automated Amino Acid Analyzer Using a Gradient HPLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis procedure was similar to that of Klapper [33] and Cohen and Strydom [34]. The samples were vacuum-dried and placed in a hydrolysis vessel containing some constant boiling HCl and 1% (v/v) phenol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis procedure was similar to that of Klapper [33] and Cohen and Strydom [34]. The samples were vacuum-dried and placed in a hydrolysis vessel containing some constant boiling HCl and 1% (v/v) phenol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, mucin was prepared according to the method of Schroten et al [19] , semipurified by gel filtration on Sepharose CL-4B, and subsequently purified by caesium chloride isopycnic density gradient ultracentrifugation [20] . Mucin was further analyzed by SDS-PAGE [21] and identified by Western blotting [22] and amino acid analysis [23,24] . Glycoprotein was estimated by the periodic acidSchiff (PAS) procedure of Mantle and Allen [25] and protein according to the method of Lowry et al [26] .…”
Section: Mucin Preparation Purification Identification and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-mg samples of lyophilized tissue were hydrolysed (110 ‱ C, 22 h) under an inert atmosphere in a sealed glass tube using 0.5 ml of HCl (5.7 M) containing 0.25 % (v/v) phenol. After cooling, opening of the tubes and drying (in vacuo), the samples were redissolved in 1 ml of citrate buffer (pH 2.2) and applied to an HPLC cation-exchange column (Waters) maintained at 62 ‱ C. Amino acids were separated using a pH gradient from 3.05 to 9.45, with detection relying on post-column fluorescence using orthophthalaldehyde [18], and reported as nmol/mg of dry tissue.…”
Section: Tissue Preparation and Fixationmentioning
confidence: 99%