See article by Illmann et al., pages 207e213 of this issue.In this issue of the Canadian Journal of Cardiology Open, Illmann et al., 1 from BC Children's Hospital in Vancouver, report their results of a survey carried out with the Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association and the Congenital Cardiac Interventional Study Consortium. As such, it is a relatively small study, but the results probably reflect the current "state of play" with regard to the appreciation of the burgeoning technique. For example, the authors found that those working in centers in the United States were more than 5 times more likely to have access to the necessary technology than those working in Canada. Financial constraints were identified as the barrier to access for half of those responding to the particular question on that topic. These results regarding the financial burden almost certainly represent the situation in other continents, particularly for those still working in the so-called Third World. This is of relevance when the whole world is facing the problem of increasing costs of health care.The conclusions reached on the basis of the questionnaire are certainly of importance. As the authors discuss, the use of such printed models greatly facilitates communication, not only between medical practitioners but also with parents, and often with the patients themselves. And, as they also comment, the technique is currently underused in the field of medical education. The authors also comment regarding an alternative approach of producing virtual dissection, which is the one we favor. This is the option to create virtual models from the 3-dimensional datasets and to interrogate them using freely available open-source software, such as Horos, and to view them on a personal computer. 2 Although we are in agreement with Illmann et al. 1 about the underuse of printed models, we would challenge their