2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2007.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new lower bound in the second Kershaw's double inequality

Abstract: In the paper, a new and elegant lower bound in the second Kershaw's double inequality is established, some alternative simple and polished proofs are given, several deduced functions involving the gamma and psi functions are proved to be decreasingly monotonic and logarithmically completely monotonic, and some remarks and comparisons are stated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lévy-Khintchine representation of bivariate logarithmic mean. In [22,Remark 3.7] and its preprint [23,Remark 3.7], the logarithmic mean L a,b (x) was proved to be increasing and concave in x ∈ (− min{a, b}, ∞).…”
Section: Origins and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lévy-Khintchine representation of bivariate logarithmic mean. In [22,Remark 3.7] and its preprint [23,Remark 3.7], the logarithmic mean L a,b (x) was proved to be increasing and concave in x ∈ (− min{a, b}, ∞).…”
Section: Origins and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], the second Kershaw's double inequality (12) was generalized, extended and refined as follows: for s, t ∈ R with s = t, the function…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inequalities(12),(13),(15),(16),(19),(21),(22) and the increasingly monotonic property of the generalized logarithmic mean L p (a, b) suggest us a question: What are the best constants and such that e (L (s,t)) | (n)(L (s, t))| | (n−1) (s)| − | (n−1) (t)| s − t − | (n) (L (s, t))|(27)are valid for positive real numbers s and t?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information, please refer to [5,7,9,10,11,12,14,19,20,21,22,23,30,32,34,35,36,38,39,40,41,49] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], the following generalization, extension and refinement of the second Kershaw's double inequality (2) were obtained: For s, t ∈ R with s = t, the function…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%