2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-7863(03)00071-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new LSM approach for planning repetitive housing projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the varied nature of PHBPs as against one-off projects, measurement of success significantly differs from place to place and from project to project (Ashely, 1988;Mahdi, 2004). Cost, time and quality has been the primal measure of success but this has been reviewed over the years (Atkinson, 1999).…”
Section: Introducationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the varied nature of PHBPs as against one-off projects, measurement of success significantly differs from place to place and from project to project (Ashely, 1988;Mahdi, 2004). Cost, time and quality has been the primal measure of success but this has been reviewed over the years (Atkinson, 1999).…”
Section: Introducationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consideration, details, rentals, requirements and other criteria differ from continent to continent, region to region and country to country (Werna, 1998;Smith, 2006). Public housing projects differ significantly from one-off projects thus requiring well structured management styles for enhanced success in its delivery (Ashely, 1988;Mahdi, 2004;Ahadzie, 2010) The issue of lack of success on public hosuing projects in Ghana has generated a lot of discussions in recent times (Amoa-Mensah, 2011). The determination of clearyly defined success criteria for PHBPs will be of prime importance not only for future schemes but will enable project managers of current shemes channel appropriate efforts and behaviours towards ensuring the attainment of success on their projects.…”
Section: Introducationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations include the inability to model continuous and simultaneous work flows of teams on the construction site, which need to be taken into account in case of overlapping, interdependent activities [12,13]. Location-based scheduling methods have been developed to take into account the location of work on the site to avoid conflicts between overlapping activities [14]. However, these methods are limited to a novel visual representation of the activities, and are all defined using the same precedence diagram that is used in CPM, Another important limitation of CPM and other traditional project scheduling methods is the assumption of unlimited resource availability, and the unexpected delays that often occur in projects due to insufficient resources [15].…”
Section: Existing Methods For Schedule Monitoring and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term mass housing project has dominantly been defined as term purely focusing on the large scale production of housing development projects (see [16][17][18]28]). However, these definitions fail to account for the unique attributes exhibited by mass housing projects.…”
Section: Mass Housing Projects and Their Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%