2016
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for capturing stem taper variation for trees of diverse morphological types

Abstract: Understanding variation in tree stem form is fundamental to both ecological and economic assessments of forest ecosystem structure and function. Stem taper models (STMs) are widely used to describe tree form, but it can be challenging to apply them to trees with stems that diverge from an idealized norm, often leading to the exclusion of many trees from stem taper studies. Here, new "whole-tree" form type classes are advanced as simple and useful groupings for capturing stem form variation of trees of diverse … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…log( H ) vs. log( D )] using linear mixed effects modelling. We tested for significant effects of crowding and shading from neighbours (CC), as well as location and species, on model coefficients, treating them as random variables (MacFarlane & Weiskettel ). The general model was log( Y ) = (β 0 + μ k + μ jk + μ ijk ) + [(β 1 + λ k + λ jk + λ ijk ) × log( X )], where μ and λ are random effects coefficients for the intercept (β 0 ) and slope (β 1 ), respectively, and subscripts i , j and k represent location, species and CC, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…log( H ) vs. log( D )] using linear mixed effects modelling. We tested for significant effects of crowding and shading from neighbours (CC), as well as location and species, on model coefficients, treating them as random variables (MacFarlane & Weiskettel ). The general model was log( Y ) = (β 0 + μ k + μ jk + μ ijk ) + [(β 1 + λ k + λ jk + λ ijk ) × log( X )], where μ and λ are random effects coefficients for the intercept (β 0 ) and slope (β 1 ), respectively, and subscripts i , j and k represent location, species and CC, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole-tree volume models that include the volume of fractions such as tree branches are required in order to provide information about the sustainable use of whole trees [2][3][4][5][6]. This could lead to an improvement of our understanding of synergies and tradeoffs between different types of forest ecosystem services, such as carbon storage, versus timber production [7]. Such models would help in decision-making associated with the sustainable extraction of more biologically renewable fuels from forests (e.g., [2,8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compatible adjustment is also considered important for biomass fractions prediction (e.g., [13,44,45]. In contrast to the relatively large body of literature on compatible stem and taper prediction (e.g., [42,43]), little effort has been made to develop compatible models for predicting the volume of important tree fractions such as branches (e.g., [4][5][6][7]). Clearly, the next phase in tree volume modelling should be to describe the distribution of the volume of the different fractions of the whole tree, not only of tree boles [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare models as a complex expert systems without division to the particular tree species we applied ranking method. The sum of ranks for all evaluation criteria was on a [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] scale, which means that the best model obtained the lowest values and the worst model obtained the highest values (Table 4). Ranks have been calculated for the estimation of d and V separately.…”
Section: The Models Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While among most coniferous species, trees of irregular shape are rare, among deciduous species and other species with high plasticity in morphology they can be quite frequent. Removing them might limit the sample to regularly-shaped trees, and so the usefulness of such models would only be limited to such trees-such models, thus, should not be used for irregular trees [23]. If such irregulars constitute a significant part of the population-a likely scenario in the case of deciduous trees-then such models are not useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%