1987
DOI: 10.1038/325794a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for measuring the surface energy of solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these values, the surface energy of a monomer particle was calculated to be γ = 1.7×10 −2 J m −2 for the monodisperse and 2.0×10 −2 J m −2 for the polydisperse SiO 2 particles. These values are in very good agreement with 2.5×10 −2 J m −2 measured for silica powder by Kendall et al (1987) and 1.86×10 −2 J m −2 measured for ∼1 µm SiO 2 particles by Heim et al (1999). This confirms the validity of the scaling model developed in Weidling et al (2012).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Surface Energy Of Macroscopic Aggregatessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For these values, the surface energy of a monomer particle was calculated to be γ = 1.7×10 −2 J m −2 for the monodisperse and 2.0×10 −2 J m −2 for the polydisperse SiO 2 particles. These values are in very good agreement with 2.5×10 −2 J m −2 measured for silica powder by Kendall et al (1987) and 1.86×10 −2 J m −2 measured for ∼1 µm SiO 2 particles by Heim et al (1999). This confirms the validity of the scaling model developed in Weidling et al (2012).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Surface Energy Of Macroscopic Aggregatessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For particle diameters between 1 and 5 km, they found a linear relation between the pull-o † force (ranging from 50 to 250 nN) and the grain size in agreement with the predictions by the JKR model. As a result, Heim et al (1999) deduced a speciÐc surface energy of c \ 0.019 J m~2, which corresponds to the earlier value of c \ 0.025 J m~2 by Kendall et al (1987). In addition, an increased surface energy due to, e.g., adsorbed layers is not the cause of H 2 O the high capture velocity as indicated by the fact that the collision experiments using particles coated with a hydrophobic layer of silane showed no signiÐcant di †erence from those with noncoated surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors experimentally veriÐed their model with centimeter-sized objects. Applied to a 1 km silica sphere adhering to a Ñat silica surface and setting the surface energy of each surface to c \ 0.025 J m~2 (Kendall, Alford, & Birchall 1987), the separation force amounts to several 100 nN. Using a modiÐed atomic force microscope, Heim et al (1999) measured the separation forces between silica spheres of several diameters down to 1 km and smooth, Ñat, and curved surfaces.…”
Section: Previous W Ork On Small-particle Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface tension of liquids has been understood and measured since the time of Young's and Laplace [91]. In 1884 van der Waals proposed a deep and elegant theory of the surface tension of liquids, which has since been rediscovered, and give important extensions, by Cahn and Hilliard [92].…”
Section: Liquids and Liquid/solid Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%