2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2009.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for mispronunciation detection using Support Vector Machine based on Pronunciation Space Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They think that a complete active learning process is divided into four stages: task definition, goal setting and planning, strategy execution and meta cognitive regulation " [13]. Task stage is the process of clarifying the new learning tasks according to their own knowledge system and analyzing the relevant conditions and factors.…”
Section: A Active Learning Model Of Winne and Butlermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They think that a complete active learning process is divided into four stages: task definition, goal setting and planning, strategy execution and meta cognitive regulation " [13]. Task stage is the process of clarifying the new learning tasks according to their own knowledge system and analyzing the relevant conditions and factors.…”
Section: A Active Learning Model Of Winne and Butlermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al [13] extracted acoustic-phonetic features and applied linear discriminant analysis (LDA), while Wei et. al [14] considered log-likelihood ratios (LLR) between the canonical phone model and a set of pronunciation variation models, and used support vector machine (SVM) for classification. Another direction is to explicitly model the possible mispronunciations based on linguistic knowledge.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, some systems make use of training data from nonnative speech to improve system performance [11,14,17], although often it is not easy to get a good amount of well-labeled nonnative data. Most recently, Qian et.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early example is Pols et al (1973), in which the automatic classification of Dutch monophthongs was investigated. More recently, research specifically targeted toward automatic pronunciation quality measures that can be employed in ASR-based CAPT systems has focused on confidence scoring (Witt, 1999;Franco et al, 2000;Yoon et al, 2010;Wei et al, 2009;van Doremalen et al, 2009) using ASR-based techniques. This type of research has shown that pronunciation errors can be accurately detected to a certain extent (Witt, 1999;Franco et al, 2000;Cucchiarini et al, 2009;Wei et al, 2009) and that difficulties may arise when it comes to identifying pronunciation errors that are based on subtle acoustic differences .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%