2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for probabilistic linguistic multi-attribute group decision making: Application to the selection of financial technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, comparative analysis is carried out to show the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed NS-DANP method under a single valued neutrosophic environment compared to other existing methods. It is consistent with most of the past research in decision analysis, where comparative analysis was made to compare their proposed methods with existing methods [62][63][64].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, comparative analysis is carried out to show the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed NS-DANP method under a single valued neutrosophic environment compared to other existing methods. It is consistent with most of the past research in decision analysis, where comparative analysis was made to compare their proposed methods with existing methods [62][63][64].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…When considering that the variation of attribute weights might influence the final ranking of alternatives [52], it is necessary to develop a new method for determining attribute weights based on the maximizing deviation method [53].…”
Section: Weight Of Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this limitation, Gou and Xu (2016) introduced novel operations of PLTSs by a linguistic scale function. Later, using this function, Mao et al (2019) introduced new operation laws and developed the GPLHWA operator and GPLHOWA operator based on Archimedean t-norms and s-norms. Zhang (2018) investigated the large group decision making and proposed a PL-WAA operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the calculation of this improved distance measure is very complex. Lately, Mao et al (2019) proposed a simple Euclidean distance measure by a linguistic scale function (Gou and Xu, 2016). Unfortunately, some counterintuitive results still appear based on this Euclidean distance, please see Table 2 in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%