2015
DOI: 10.1785/0120150099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for Producing Automated Seismic Bulletins: Probabilistic Event Detection, Association, and Location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the proposed association algorithm does not incorporate any information about the source nor the atmospheric dynamics. This procedure could be improved by assessing the consistency of arrival time differences across a network of satellites and stations using a range of possible sources, similarly to the methods used for the automated production of seismic bulletins (Draelos et al 2015). In contrast to seismic media, atmospheric velocities, i.e., winds, are time-dependent which introduces further complexity when computing theoretical source-receiver arrival times.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the proposed association algorithm does not incorporate any information about the source nor the atmospheric dynamics. This procedure could be improved by assessing the consistency of arrival time differences across a network of satellites and stations using a range of possible sources, similarly to the methods used for the automated production of seismic bulletins (Draelos et al 2015). In contrast to seismic media, atmospheric velocities, i.e., winds, are time-dependent which introduces further complexity when computing theoretical source-receiver arrival times.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques developed for processing waveform data from low‐volume data sets, which are described above, treat each station or array separately. In general, these techniques are designed to detect signals at a given station or array; signals from separate stations and/or arrays are subsequently grouped using association techniques to build events (Draelos et al., 2015; Yeck et al., 2019). For medium volume/medium density data sets, a common approach is to process data across a network by migrating or backprojecting the waveform data back to a series of event hypotheses (Drew et al., 2013; Grigoli et al., 2014; Kao & Shan, 2004; Langet et al., 2014).…”
Section: Drivers Of Big Data Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We generate 8 random sequences of 5000 earthquakes each within the region. For each sequence, the time between consecutive events is randomly drawn from a uniform distribution, with a fixed minimum value of 0 seconds, and a maximum value of 10,12,16,20,24,32,64, and 128 seconds, respectively. We then define ∆t o as the average time between events over the 5000 events in the sequence.…”
Section: Stress Testing Phaselink In Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major shortcoming of the method is that it will not only identify earthquakes when present but also any other types of impulsive transient signals that seismometers record. This led to the development of phase association algorithms, which examine combinations of triggers on different stations to see whether any set have arrival time patterns consistent with those of earthquakes (Draelos et al, ; Johnson et al, ; LeBras et al, ; Myers et al, ; Reynen & Audet, ; Stewart, ). The association process therefore evolved from one of simply grouping seismic phases together to being ultimately responsible for deciding whether an earthquake occurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%