2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/494239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for Short Multivariate Fuzzy Time Series Based on Genetic Algorithm and Fuzzy Clustering

Abstract: Forecasting activities play an important role in our daily life. In recent years, fuzzy time series (FTS) methods were developed to deal with forecasting problems. FTS attracted researchers because of its ability to predict the future values in some critical situations where most standard forecasting models are doubtfully applicable or produce bad fittings. However, some critical issues in FTS are still open; these issues are often subjective and affect the accuracy of forecasting. In this paper, we focus on i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, too many intervals causes complexity and reduces the essence of fuzzy time series [26,27,28,29].…”
Section: B Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, too many intervals causes complexity and reduces the essence of fuzzy time series [26,27,28,29].…”
Section: B Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalam penelitian ini, prediksi curah hujan DKI Jakarta menggunakan metode FTS dikarenakan pada kemampuan model dalam menangani data deret waktu tanpa perlu memvalidasi teori apapun (Selim & Elanany, 2013). Metode FTS pertama kali digunakan oleh Song & Chissom (1993)…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…In addition, the traffic accident data have been employed in the analysis of several set partitioning models (Lee et al 2007;Jilani and Burney 2008;Egrioglu 2012;Kamal and Gihan 2013). Table 9 shows actual in-sample (trained model) predictions for one of the accident occurrence data that were analysed, while Tables 10, 11 and 12 show the NS-GFMAPR and S-GFMAPR prediction fitness to data used in building the model in comparison with results obtained by the established models previously mentioned.…”
Section: Gfmapr Data Set Partitioning Accuracy In Model Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%