2008
DOI: 10.1177/096739110801600109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for Testing and Evaluating the Long-Time Resistance to Oxidation of Polyolefinic Products

Abstract: Oxidative long time resistance is essential for many polyolefinic products, especially if repair or exchange is not possible as encountered in many building applications. For the time being, CE-standards for geosynthetics are covering the needs of a minimum lifetime of 25 years only, though many applications require longer lifetimes (up to 100 years and more). Testing long time oxidation resistance is complicated by the complex interplay of physico-chemical processes and reactions in combination with the need … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of A, B and C are similar to those quoted by Schröder et al (2008) for a polypropylene geosynthetic product analysed using the above formula: ln A ¼ 30.4, B ¼ À12045, C ¼ 8.36, allowing for their A being the natural logarithm of our A. BAM, Berlin, Germany performed tests on the same material using the same procedure, from which they derived the parameters ln A ¼ 28.8, B ¼ À11435, C ¼ 7.92, and the durations corresponding to the three conditions used here were 11.6, 20.0 and 73.6 days respectively (BAM, personal communication). These results are comparable.…”
Section: Wet Autoclave Testssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The values of A, B and C are similar to those quoted by Schröder et al (2008) for a polypropylene geosynthetic product analysed using the above formula: ln A ¼ 30.4, B ¼ À12045, C ¼ 8.36, allowing for their A being the natural logarithm of our A. BAM, Berlin, Germany performed tests on the same material using the same procedure, from which they derived the parameters ln A ¼ 28.8, B ¼ À11435, C ¼ 7.92, and the durations corresponding to the three conditions used here were 11.6, 20.0 and 73.6 days respectively (BAM, personal communication). These results are comparable.…”
Section: Wet Autoclave Testssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…If the activation energy was to decrease further at lower temperatures, as suggested by Schröder et al (2008), then all three graphs in Fig. 8 would acquire a lower gradient but remain as far apart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations