2000
DOI: 10.1109/9.847726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators

Abstract: This paper describes a new approach for generalizing the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. A set of samples are used to parameterize the mean and covariance of a (not necessarily Gaussian) probability distribution. The method yields a filter that is more accurate than an extended Kalman filter (EKF) and easier to implement than an EKF or a Gauss second-order filter. Its effectiveness is demonstrated using an example.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
1,811
0
20

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,165 publications
(1,834 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
1,811
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the degree of accuracy of the EKF relies on the validity of the linear approximation and is not suitable for highly non-Gaussian conditional probability density functions, since it only updates the first two moments (mean and covariance) [13]. In addition, the calculation of the Jacobian matrix, used to linearize the nonlinear function in an EKF algorithm, can be complex causing implementation difficulties [14], [15]. In order to overcome these limitations, the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) has been proposed by Julier and Uhlmann [14], [15].…”
Section: Kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the degree of accuracy of the EKF relies on the validity of the linear approximation and is not suitable for highly non-Gaussian conditional probability density functions, since it only updates the first two moments (mean and covariance) [13]. In addition, the calculation of the Jacobian matrix, used to linearize the nonlinear function in an EKF algorithm, can be complex causing implementation difficulties [14], [15]. In order to overcome these limitations, the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) has been proposed by Julier and Uhlmann [14], [15].…”
Section: Kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the calculation of the Jacobian matrix, used to linearize the nonlinear function in an EKF algorithm, can be complex causing implementation difficulties [14], [15]. In order to overcome these limitations, the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) has been proposed by Julier and Uhlmann [14], [15]. Based on EKF and UKF, adaptive Kalman filters have been developed to achieve much better estimation performance for non linear systems by adjusting the noise covariance matrices during estimation [16].…”
Section: Kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to reduce the effect of nonlinearities is to apply iteratively the filter (IEKF) as indicated by Zhang [220]. Another solution is to use the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF), an extension to the EKF that takes into account the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances [105,107,203]. Numerical instability may occur even with the Joseph form of the error covariance matrix.…”
Section: C6 Bibliographical Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that the divergence of the algorithm is due to the nonlinearities of the model used. Their contribution suggests that robust statistics and nonlinear approaches to KF, such as the Unscented KF [105], should be explored as means to more robust solutions to CML.…”
Section: Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, if they are linear (or mildly nonlinear) functions, the celebrated Kalman filter (or its extended or unscented variants) dominates the class of possible solutions. [5][6][7] Second, if f k is linear or nonlinear and h k severely nonlinear but known and computationally tractable, the particle filters estimating x k and ξ k via a Monte Carlo sampling from the state space prevail, eg, the work of Cappé et al 8 Moreover, the model structure allows marginalized (Rao-Blackwellized) particle filtering (MPF): ξ k is sampled, whereas x k is estimated via a Kalman filter. 9,10 The marginalization reduces the number of necessary particles and leads to a lower estimator variance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%