2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method of administering the Grooved Pegboard Test: Performance as a function of handedness and sex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

12
90
3
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
12
90
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, the results of this study contrast with those of Briden and Roy 45 who revealed performance differences between the sexes during removal/placement of pegs. However, some confounding variables such as menopause status and menstrual cycle phase that can promote changes in woman physiology and further influence motor control response of elderly women was not controlled in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, the results of this study contrast with those of Briden and Roy 45 who revealed performance differences between the sexes during removal/placement of pegs. However, some confounding variables such as menopause status and menstrual cycle phase that can promote changes in woman physiology and further influence motor control response of elderly women was not controlled in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The GPT, originally, involves the analysis of the placement of small shaped key-pegs which must be oriented correctly to fit in a hole with a random orientation. Assessing the withdrawal of these pegs, Bryden and Roy 45 suggested that we can discriminate measures of visuomotor amplitude (placement) to a simple measurement of motor speed (withdrawal). However, since GPT measures how quickly the 25 pegs are placed and withdrawn, it could be argued that these tasks, in fact, cover a hybrid control phase, which consist of both initial impulse and current control phases, although the current control is more robust in the placement task as it demands more accuracy from the participant 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected the standardized activities to function differently based on user characteristics because this was reported in studies using other performance tests. There have been significant differences between males and females [9] and between dominant and nondominant sides [27][28]. However, none of the standardized activities in our study favored a particular prosthetic side or sex.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…É frequente a observação de assimetria de desempenho na tarefa do Grooved Pegboard em diferentes populações e condições experimentais 24,25 . Nossos resultados indicaram que independente da condição experimental, a assimetria foi mantida com menor tempo de movimento para a mão direita.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified