2008
DOI: 10.1239/aap/1222868180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new metric between distributions of point processes

Abstract: Most metrics between finite point measures currently used in the literature have the flaw that they do not treat differing total masses in an adequate manner for applications. This paper introduces a new metricd 1 that combines positional differences of points under a closest match with the relative difference in total mass in a way that fixes this flaw. A comprehensive collection of theoretical results aboutd 1 and its induced Wasserstein metric d 2 for point process distributions are given, including example… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some alternatives are discussed in Mateu et al (2015). Another option, that will prove to be more appropriate for our applications in Section 4, is the optimal matching distance introduced by Schuhmacher and Xia (2008). Letting x = {x 1 , .…”
Section: Continuous Time Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some alternatives are discussed in Mateu et al (2015). Another option, that will prove to be more appropriate for our applications in Section 4, is the optimal matching distance introduced by Schuhmacher and Xia (2008). Letting x = {x 1 , .…”
Section: Continuous Time Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For s = 0, cost c (1) is never higher than c (0) so one can always choose â = 1. It is interesting to note that for sufficiently low sensing costs, according to (14), we only take action if the probability of existence is not too low or too high. That is, we measure the target if we are not very confident whether the target exists or not, and we therefore gain valuable information by measuring it.…”
Section: Analysis I: One Potential Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, metric-driven sensor management, in which the cost function is related to a metric, provides a clear interpretation of what the objective is, and also measurable results in terms of performance evaluation. In this respect, the optimal subpattern assignment metric (OSPA) is a widely-used metric [14], [15]. A sensor management algorithm based on the OSPA metric was proposed in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It holds d 2 ¤ d 2 and d 2 metricizes weak convergence (see Proposition 2.3. (ii) and (iii) in [26]). We consider the Bernoulli process µ n with intensity measure ν n and the Poisson point process µ with intensity measure ν as given in Definition 4.18.…”
Section: The Vague Topologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We start by considering the Wasserstein metrics d 2 and d 2 . Since the definitions of d 2 and d 2 are a bit lengthy and we do not actually utilise the definitions in our arguments we will only provide a reference where the metrics are defined (see [26]). It holds d 2 ¤ d 2 and d 2 metricizes weak convergence (see Proposition 2.3.…”
Section: The Vague Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%