2009
DOI: 10.1243/09576509jpe700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new model for damping controlled fluidelastic instability in heat exchanger tube arrays

Abstract: Heat exchnager tube arrays are susceptible to damage due to flow-induced vibration, with fluidelastic instability the potnetially the most destructive mechanism. In this paper a simple wake model consisting of a convecting vortex sheet is proposed to represent the transient nature of fluidelastic forces present in a tube array. Using this model, the memory function proposed by Granger and Paidoussis has been obtained without the need to calibrate the model with experimental data. The resulting function is foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some theoretical or semi-empirical FEI models have been developed to predict the critical velocity such as the quasi-static (Blevins, 1974;Connors, 1970), the quasi-steady (Price & Paidoussis, 1984), the quasi-unsteady model (Granger & Paidoussis, 1996;Meskell, 2009), the semi-analytical channel flow model (Lever & Weaver, 1982) and the unsteady model (Chen, 1987;Tanaka & Takahara, 1981). The differences among these models lie in the definitions of the dynamic inviscid, and the pressure in the wake regions to be constant, the pressure distribution can be obtained analytically and then the drag force can be achieved by integration.…”
Section: The Nature Of Fluidelastic Instability In Tube Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some theoretical or semi-empirical FEI models have been developed to predict the critical velocity such as the quasi-static (Blevins, 1974;Connors, 1970), the quasi-steady (Price & Paidoussis, 1984), the quasi-unsteady model (Granger & Paidoussis, 1996;Meskell, 2009), the semi-analytical channel flow model (Lever & Weaver, 1982) and the unsteady model (Chen, 1987;Tanaka & Takahara, 1981). The differences among these models lie in the definitions of the dynamic inviscid, and the pressure in the wake regions to be constant, the pressure distribution can be obtained analytically and then the drag force can be achieved by integration.…”
Section: The Nature Of Fluidelastic Instability In Tube Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To support the assumption of the physics of the time delay proposed by Granger and Paidoussis (1996), Meskell (2009) proposed a simple wake model to clarify that the underlying process of vorticity transport accounts for the time delay. The memory function is obtained by numerical integration of the governing equations without calibrating the model with experimental data.…”
Section: Quasi-unsteady Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was extended by Granger and Paidoussis (1996) to include an empirical memory function rather than a simple time lag to better represent the convective nature of the flow. Meskell (2009) proposed a theoretical approximation for this memory function, so that the only empirical input needed for the model of fluidelastic instability would be the force coefficients. For simplicity, the original quasi-steady model, with a constant empirical time delay will be considered here.…”
Section: Implications For Models Of Fluidelastic Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, Granger and Paidoussis (1996) describe it as a memory effect due to the diffusion of thin vorticity layers from the oscillating tube surface into its boundary layer, to be finally convected downstream. Posteriorly, Meskell (2009) proposed a simple wake model to estimate Granger and Paidoussis's memory function, showing that that process of vorticity transport can produce the time delay of the fluidelastic force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%