2019
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Model for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Obesity in Early Childhood

Abstract: Background: Childhood obesity is a serious public health issue. In Australia, 1 in 4 children is already affected by overweight or obesity at the time of school entry. Governments around the world have recognized this problem through investment in the prevention of pediatric obesity, yet few interventions in early childhood have been subjected to economic evaluation. Information on cost-effectiveness is vital to decisions about program implementation. A challenge in evaluating preventive interventio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reviews have also noted the lack of assessment of the cost‐effectiveness of interventions . Other authors have also noted the lack of economic evaluations of childhood obesity interventions, particularly in the early years; this is changing however . In the current climate of expenditure cuts to health services, it is difficult for health professionals to protect time to deliver such interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reviews have also noted the lack of assessment of the cost‐effectiveness of interventions . Other authors have also noted the lack of economic evaluations of childhood obesity interventions, particularly in the early years; this is changing however . In the current climate of expenditure cuts to health services, it is difficult for health professionals to protect time to deliver such interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failing to include childhood health outcomes risks underestimating the economic benefits of early intervention and increases levels of uncertainty when longer time horizons are considered. Moreover, some decision makers are interested in early outcomes in their own right 82 . One solution is to present economic outcomes over a selected range of time horizons up to death, allowing the impact on uncertainty to be explicitly communicated 59,82 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strength of our study is that the economic evaluation is based on data from an RCT and that the resources used to deliver the intervention were derived from trial records. The EPOCH microsimulation model, used to predict BMI trajectories, is based on a large Australian longitudinal cohort and it has been internally validated to age 15 years (25), thus providing confidence in the prediction of future BMI. We used best practice methods for economic evaluation (35); utilities for different weight status groups were derived from a systematic review and meta‐analysis (26), and direct health care costs were derived from national‐level Australian data (31,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary outcome was BMI at 5 and 15 years. We used the recently developed Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood (EPOCH) health economic model to estimate cost‐effectiveness (25). This is a deterministic microsimulation model that predicts individual‐level child BMI trajectories and associated QALYs and health care costs throughout childhood and adolescence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation