2022
DOI: 10.1109/tem.2019.2937579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on k-Means Clustering Within Hesitant Linguistic Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, computing with words (CW) was proposed by [23] and the 2-tuple linguistic representation model was initiated by [24]. A large number of extended methods based on the 2-tuple linguistic model have been developed to a notable degree [9,25,26]; probabilistic hesitant fuzzy language was presented to solve the problem of DMs hesitating between multiple options in the evaluation process [27]; linguistic distribution assessments can enable DMs to better reflect their actual experience and avoid information loss and distortion [9,25]; double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets allow DMs to evaluate problems and solutions using a much more intuitive expression method [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, computing with words (CW) was proposed by [23] and the 2-tuple linguistic representation model was initiated by [24]. A large number of extended methods based on the 2-tuple linguistic model have been developed to a notable degree [9,25,26]; probabilistic hesitant fuzzy language was presented to solve the problem of DMs hesitating between multiple options in the evaluation process [27]; linguistic distribution assessments can enable DMs to better reflect their actual experience and avoid information loss and distortion [9,25]; double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets allow DMs to evaluate problems and solutions using a much more intuitive expression method [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from general risk evaluation methods that analyze problems after an adverse event occurs, FMEA is a tool for proactive risk assessment and management, evaluating and eliminating failures before they occur or reach customers [9,10]. Therefore, it has been widely utilized in various practical scenarios, such as cold-chain logistics management [11], healthcare services [12], energy issues [13,14], semiconductor manufacturing [15], etc. Usually, a classic FMEA model includes the following four steps: (1) failure modes (FMs) and their causes and results are identified; (2) the risk priorities of FMs are determined by risk priority numbers (RPNs), which involves three risk factors: the probability of occurrence (O), the severity of effects (S), and the difficulty of detection (D); (3) the risk priority ranking of FMs is obtained, such that the FMs with larger RPN values would cause severer problems, requiring higher priorities; (4) corresponding measures are taken for high-risk issues [10,16,17].…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evaluated in the context of farming applications. Duan et al [28] analyze evaluations of failure modes in natural language by FMEA experts, using fuzzy sets to extract features, and the kmeans algorithm to cluster the failure modes. Xu et al [29] proposed a method to construct the component-failure mode (CF) matrix automatically, by mining unstructured texts using the Apriori algorithm and the semantic dictionary WordNet to build a standard set of failure modes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, decision makers can utilize DHHLTSs to express their opinions comprehensively. Given these advantages, many researchers have adopted the DHHLTSs to handle complex uncertain linguistic information in various decision-making problems [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%