2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022sw003155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Model for Nowcasting the Aviation Radiation Environment With Comparisons to In Situ Measurements During GLEs

Abstract: Significant increases to the atmospheric radiation environment are recorded by a network of ground level neutron monitors as ground level enhancements (GLEs). These space weather phenomena pose a risk to aviation via single event effects in aircraft electronics and ionizing dose to passengers and crew. Under the UK Space Weather Instrumentation, Measurement, Modeling and Risk programme, we have developed a new model to provide nowcasts of the aviation radiation environment, including both the galactic cosmic r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years several models for computation of the exposure at flight altitudes have been developed (e.g., Copeland, 2017; Ferrari et al., 2001; Hands et al., 2022; Latocha et al., 2009; Mertens et al., 2013). While the models agree well for the assessment of the exposure due to GCRs (for details see Bottollier‐Depois et al., 2009; Yang & Sheu, 2020, and references therein), during GLEs, when the exposure is a superposition of the contributions of GCRs and SEPs, a significant difference between the models was reported (for details see Bütikofer & Flückiger, 2013, 2015).…”
Section: Assessment Of Exposure At Flight Altitudes During Gle # 60mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the years several models for computation of the exposure at flight altitudes have been developed (e.g., Copeland, 2017; Ferrari et al., 2001; Hands et al., 2022; Latocha et al., 2009; Mertens et al., 2013). While the models agree well for the assessment of the exposure due to GCRs (for details see Bottollier‐Depois et al., 2009; Yang & Sheu, 2020, and references therein), during GLEs, when the exposure is a superposition of the contributions of GCRs and SEPs, a significant difference between the models was reported (for details see Bütikofer & Flückiger, 2013, 2015).…”
Section: Assessment Of Exposure At Flight Altitudes During Gle # 60mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Easter event, that is, GLE # 60, was notable because the exposure was measured during the PRG‐JFK flight by a mobile dosimetric unit (MDU) Liulin device, (see the details in Spurny & Dachev, 2001; Beck et al., 2009). It is important to note that GLE # 60 is not the only GLE to have dosimetric measurements taken during the event (e.g., Hands et al., 2022), future work is planned to compare a full‐chain analysis and our model with the direct measurements obtained during these other events. The MDU Liulin is based on a silicon semiconductor detector, which measures the deposited energy and the amount of interacting particles, that is the dose rate in silicon and particle flux (for details see Dachev et al., 2011) and references therein).…”
Section: Assessment Of Exposure At Flight Altitudes During Gle # 60mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wiliams [10] and James [11] et al have carried out a number of studies on coronal mass ejections (CMEs), proving that CMEs are the largest rapid ejection phenomenon in the solar atmosphere and the main source of disturbance for space weather. These disturbances may affect the high-frequency radio wave communications that are used by the aviation industry [12], affect the normal operation of global navigation satellite systems [13,14], and even cause increased radiation that endangers the health of flight crews and passengers [15,16]. When encountering unusual space weather, airlines respond to these threats with measures such as cancelling flight plans, lowering flight altitudes, and changing flight routes, thereby resulting in additional fuel consumption [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These disturbances may affect the high-frequency radio wave communications that are used by the aviation industry [12], affect the normal operation of global navigation satellite systems [13,14], and even cause increased radiation that endangers the health of flight crews and passengers [15,16]. When encountering unusual space weather, airlines respond to these threats with measures such as cancelling flight plans, lowering flight altitudes, and changing flight routes, thereby resulting in additional fuel consumption [15,16]. In addition, when the timing of space weather affects the normal operation of satellite navigation, aircraft must use ground navigation instead of satellite navigation, which leads to higher standards for aircraft separation and lower airspace capacity, resulting in increased flight delays, increased costs, and other problems [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%