2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2008.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new model for the preemptive earliness–tardiness scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also have earliness and tardiness scheduling model (13). Actually the earliness/tardiness objectives are often used in the scheduling problem.…”
Section: Models For Flow Shop Scheduling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can also have earliness and tardiness scheduling model (13). Actually the earliness/tardiness objectives are often used in the scheduling problem.…”
Section: Models For Flow Shop Scheduling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In flow shop scheduling literature, there are numerous papers that have investigated these problems [1,13,19,30]. Most research is dedicated to single-criterion problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem may be solved in OðnlognÞ time by sorting the operations in non-decreasing order of their ready times and then scheduling any unit job that is available as early as possible. A similar reasoning for the planning horizon is applied by Runge and Sound [19] in order to compute a valid lower bound for a preemptive single-machine E/T scheduling problem based on the transportation problem. Second, very large instances of the transportation problem can be solved very effectively by standard solvers and the single-machine instances derived from JS-TWT in our computational study do not have more than 20 jobs.…”
Section: Single-machine Subproblemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using local search algorithm and a branch-and-bound procedure, the authors showed there is a very small gap between their results and optimum solutions. Runge and Sourd (2009) addressed a new model for the single machine E/T scheduling problem where preemption is allowed. In this model, presented interruption costs are based on the WIP of the job.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%