2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new model to evaluate the dynamic adaptation of an electric distribution system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demand-side management (DSM) is the process of managing the consumption of energy to optimize available and planned generation resources, and DSMIPs are the actions conducted by energy suppliers to promote investment. Garcia et al (2008) presented a model developed to evaluate the Dynamic Adaptation of an Electric Energy Distribution System with respect to planning for a given period of Tariff Control. The model is based on a two-stage strategy that deals with the mid/short-term and long-term planning, respectively.…”
Section: Ahp and Anp In The Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demand-side management (DSM) is the process of managing the consumption of energy to optimize available and planned generation resources, and DSMIPs are the actions conducted by energy suppliers to promote investment. Garcia et al (2008) presented a model developed to evaluate the Dynamic Adaptation of an Electric Energy Distribution System with respect to planning for a given period of Tariff Control. The model is based on a two-stage strategy that deals with the mid/short-term and long-term planning, respectively.…”
Section: Ahp and Anp In The Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…over a 5-20 year time horizon, the foundation of which is normally a set of electricity (or energy) demand projections. Electricity capacity expansion planning generally tends to be based on some type of leastcost optimisation given various constraints that mirror existing physical infrastructure conditions, Elshafei, 1979, Garcia et al, 2008, Ghanadan and Koomey, 2005, Güven, 1994, Hart and Jacobson, 2011, Heinrich et al, 2007, Kobos et al, 2006, Pokharel and Chandrashekar, 1998, Psarras et al, 1990, Rachmatullah et al, 2007, Rath-Nagel and Voss, 1981, Samouilidis and Berahas, 1983, Shrestha and Bhattarai, 1994, Silva and Nakata, 2009, Spinney and Watkins, 1996, St. Denis and Parker, 2009, Turkson, 1990, Voropai and Ivanova, 2002, and Wu et al, 2000. 7 See e.g., Arango and Larsen, 2011, Auriol and Blanc, 2009, Dubash, 2003, Gillwald, 2005, Gratwick and Eberhard, 2008, Gualberti et al, 2009, Habtetsion and Tsighe, 2007, Haselip, 2007, Haselip and Hilson, 2005, Haselip and Potter, 2010, Jamasb, 2006, Malgas and Eberhard, 2011, Mebratu and Wamukonya, 2007, Nagayama, 2007, Nagayama, 2009, Nagayama and Kashiwagi, 2007, Nyoike, 2002…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It aims to minimise capital and investment cost. Paper [11] has developed a model based on two‐stage procedure that involves mid‐ and long‐term planning. A dynamic model is presented in [12] for expansion of distribution system at the presence of DER to solve total cost and technical constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%