2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-02868-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new model updating strategy with physics-based and data-driven models

Abstract: For engineering simulation models, insufficient experimental data and imperfect understanding of underlying physical principles often make predictive models inaccurate. It is difficult to reduce the model bias effectively with limited information. To improve the predictive performances of the models, this paper proposes a new model updating strategy utilizing a data-driven model to integrate with a physics-based model. One of the main strengths of the proposed method is that it maximizes the utilization of exi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve computational efficiency and reduce the cost of computation, meta-model methods have been developed. The meta-model methods obtain relatively simple proxy models by fitting the sample data of the FE model, such as the optimal polynomial response surface model [11], the Polynomial-chaotic Kriging (PCK) [12], the vectorial surrogate modeling (VSM) approach [13], the Gaussian process (GP) regression [14], the adaptive metamodel [15], etc. However, the accuracy of meta-model methods is relatively low and highly related to the determination of sample space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve computational efficiency and reduce the cost of computation, meta-model methods have been developed. The meta-model methods obtain relatively simple proxy models by fitting the sample data of the FE model, such as the optimal polynomial response surface model [11], the Polynomial-chaotic Kriging (PCK) [12], the vectorial surrogate modeling (VSM) approach [13], the Gaussian process (GP) regression [14], the adaptive metamodel [15], etc. However, the accuracy of meta-model methods is relatively low and highly related to the determination of sample space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%