2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new multi-control-point pushover methodology for the seismic assessment of historic masonry buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the capacity curve, the structural integrity is identified by using N2 method, which was proposed by Fajfar [34] for framed structures, and subsequently extended to historical masonry buildings [35][36][37]. As reported in [38,39], the evaluation of the collapse acceleration, which activates the mechanisms, strongly depends on the choice of the control point. Choosing a control point rather than another one, might produce erroneousness structural assessment especially for irregular structures, which cannot guarantee a box behaviour.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the capacity curve, the structural integrity is identified by using N2 method, which was proposed by Fajfar [34] for framed structures, and subsequently extended to historical masonry buildings [35][36][37]. As reported in [38,39], the evaluation of the collapse acceleration, which activates the mechanisms, strongly depends on the choice of the control point. Choosing a control point rather than another one, might produce erroneousness structural assessment especially for irregular structures, which cannot guarantee a box behaviour.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh size was established equal to 0.3 m. The tower was assumed to be clamped at the base and constituted by three groups of homogeneous and isotropic materials (three-group discretization) whose initial mechanical properties, chosen in accordance to the Italian Technical Standards for Structures [32], are reported in Table 2. The results of the preliminary modal analysis, implemented through the Lanczos method [17,21,33,34], are resumed in Table 3 and Figure 6. A remarkable difference is found among the frequencies of the EM and those of the NM, being the latter not yet calibrated on the basis of the experimental outcome.…”
Section: Preliminary Fe Model and Modal Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for both the masonry column and the external reinforcement a macro model approach was used. The macro model approach, based on the same approach used in reinforced concrete structures, has been used in the analysis of masonry structures as reported in the technical literature; moreover, this strategy was adopted for un-strengthened column in order to properly replicate new masonry structures (Verre et al, 2019) or analyze the behavior of existing historical structures (Fortunato et al, 2017 andOlivito andPorzio, 2019). This technique does not allow to distinguish the single brick and the mortar joint (vertical or horizontal).…”
Section: Geometrical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%