2013
DOI: 10.3906/elk-1109-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new multiobjective fuzzy shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for optimal reconfiguration of radial distribution systems in the presence of reactive power compensators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with HBB-BC [13] and hybrid PSO (HPSO) [26], the 𝑃 π‘™π‘œπ‘ π‘  reduction and 𝑉 π‘šπ‘–π‘› of AEO are worse than those of two mentioned method but the LUBI index and the number of switch operations of AEO is better than those of HBB-BC and HPSO. Meanwhile, the minimum voltage and the number of switch operations of AEO are better performance than those of SFLA [14]. This confirms that AEO is an effective approach for the single as well as the multi-goal ENRP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with HBB-BC [13] and hybrid PSO (HPSO) [26], the 𝑃 π‘™π‘œπ‘ π‘  reduction and 𝑉 π‘šπ‘–π‘› of AEO are worse than those of two mentioned method but the LUBI index and the number of switch operations of AEO is better than those of HBB-BC and HPSO. Meanwhile, the minimum voltage and the number of switch operations of AEO are better performance than those of SFLA [14]. This confirms that AEO is an effective approach for the single as well as the multi-goal ENRP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…For case 1, the optimal configuration obtained by AEO is the same with MPSO [1], RRA [16], HSA [6], PSO [5], HBB-BC [13] and IWO [15]. Compared with FWA [7], ant colony algorithm (ACO) [25] and SFLA [14], the minimum voltage of these methods are higher than that of AEO but their reduction of 𝑃 π‘™π‘œπ‘ π‘  is lower than that of AEO. For the case 4, the 𝑃 π‘™π‘œπ‘ π‘  reduction, minimum voltage and LUBI index obtained by AEO are worse than those of RRA [16] and IWO [15] but the number of switch operations of AEO is less than that of RRA and IWO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the table, the feeder balance (FB) is not evaluated due to taking power from only a feeder of this system. Compared with Fuzzy-SFL [44], P loss and LB gained by IMSA is 5.023 kW and 0.0016 higher than those of Fuzzy-SFL but V min obtained by IMSA is 0.0018 higher than that of Fuzzy-SFL and number of switching change (NSC) obtained by IMSA is 4 less than that of Fuzzy-SFL. e P loss , V min and LB obtained by IMSA are as few improvement as those of MOIWO [32] but NSC obtained by IMSA is 4 and 2 less than that of MOIWO.…”
Section: E First Testmentioning
confidence: 82%