1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03016.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new non‐linear pseudo‐Laplacian filter for enhancement of secondary electron images

Abstract: SUMMARY A simple, yet effective, non‐linear pseudo‐Laplacian filter has been newly developed to enhance secondary electron (SE) images. This filter is a combination of the second derivative along the direction of the local gradient and a non‐linear weight factor. The filter can successfully enhance SE images without the undesirable effects of noise which are often seen in conventional Laplacian filtered images. Hence, the processed results with high image quality can make original SE images easier to interpret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When combined with digital image processing, the digitally recorded SEM images provide some additional options. Algorithms for enhancement of edges and local contrast as well as suppression of noise ( Oho et al ., 1984 , 1986, 1987, 1990) allow important image structures to be emphasized ( Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When combined with digital image processing, the digitally recorded SEM images provide some additional options. Algorithms for enhancement of edges and local contrast as well as suppression of noise ( Oho et al ., 1984 , 1986, 1987, 1990) allow important image structures to be emphasized ( Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to conventional photographs, digital images of SEM data allow digital filtering for noise reduction, edge enhancement, etc. ( Oho et al ., 1990 ; Oho & Peters, 1994) and superior control of contrast and gradation curve ( Oho, 1992), and provide data sets ideal for automated morphometry and image analysis ( Martin et al ., 1985 ; Holmes et al ., 1987 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many noise removal techniques have been introduced to enhance the quality of images corrupted by noise, but because of some characteristics of different techniques, for example, dependency on image structure, presence of different processing parameters, and degradation of image important details, they can only be used in some special fields. Several different noise reduction approaches have been proposed in SEM field (Herzog et al ., ; Yew and Pease, ; Lewis and Sakrison, ; Oron and Gilbert, ; Jones and Smith, ; Oho et al ., , ; Yano and Nomura, ; Sim et al ., , , ; Kiani et al ., ). Different filters use various approaches to achieve this aim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques for noise removal using digital image processing were introduced to the SEM field (Herzog et al, ; Yew and Peace, ; Lewis and Sakrison, ; Oron and Gilbert, ; Jones and Smith, ; Oho et al, , ; Yano and Nomura, ; Sim et al, ). However, since we have to usually submit to the side effects of noise removal processing, that is, the degradation of important information (processing artifacts), only a few techniques are effectively utilized in many commercial SEMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%