2016
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2015.2481978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Notion of Effective Resistance for Directed Graphs—Part I: Definition and Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that according to (Young et al, 2016a, Section II) L(P ) is not unique and depends on the choice of Q, while R is independent of the choice of Q. To compare R with our proposed resistance distance Ω, it boils down to a comparison between Y and the fundamental matrix F or the group inverse D. While both R and Ω does not define a metric in general, in Proposition 1.2 below we show that Ω does define a metric when P is doubly stochastic while it is unclear whether R also defines a metric in this setting.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that according to (Young et al, 2016a, Section II) L(P ) is not unique and depends on the choice of Q, while R is independent of the choice of Q. To compare R with our proposed resistance distance Ω, it boils down to a comparison between Y and the fundamental matrix F or the group inverse D. While both R and Ω does not define a metric in general, in Proposition 1.2 below we show that Ω does define a metric when P is doubly stochastic while it is unclear whether R also defines a metric in this setting.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is not directly possible. Indeed, the notion of effective resistance has been recently introduced for both directed and undirected graphs as [30],…”
Section: Example 3 Consider the Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also highlight the case where the condition becomes necessary and sufficient. Furthermore, it is argued that for directed graphs, the recently proposed notion of effective resistance [30] is not applicable to interpret the obtained upper bound. By partitioning the nodes of the graph into some sets, we identify "sensitive pairs of nodes" with the following property: If there exists at least one edge with sufficiently small negative weight, the Laplacian matrix has at least one eigenvalue with negative real part.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This therefore allows one to study connectivity of vertices without employing paths; which is potentially useful since defining a path, as mentioned above, is problematic for matrix-weighted graphs. One may ask why our formulation is in terms of effective conductance instead of the commoner effective resistance, e.g., [17]. The reason is that the conductances we work with are matrix-valued and not necessarily invertible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%