2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new numerical approach for the simulation of the growth of inorganic nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past 30 years, numerous scholars have attempted to solve the PBE. Three main numerical methods have been proposed and evaluated: the method of moments (Hulburt and Katz, 1964;Lee et al, 1984;McGraw, 1997;Frenklach, 2002;Marchisio et al, 2003;Park, 2003;Yu et al, 2008a), the sectional method (Landgrebe and Pratsinis, 1990), and the stochastic particle method or Monte Carlo method (Kraft, 2005;Morgan et al, 2006;Kruis et al, 2012;Zhao and Zheng, 2013). Both the advantages and disadvantages of these three methods were compared by Kraft (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past 30 years, numerous scholars have attempted to solve the PBE. Three main numerical methods have been proposed and evaluated: the method of moments (Hulburt and Katz, 1964;Lee et al, 1984;McGraw, 1997;Frenklach, 2002;Marchisio et al, 2003;Park, 2003;Yu et al, 2008a), the sectional method (Landgrebe and Pratsinis, 1990), and the stochastic particle method or Monte Carlo method (Kraft, 2005;Morgan et al, 2006;Kruis et al, 2012;Zhao and Zheng, 2013). Both the advantages and disadvantages of these three methods were compared by Kraft (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After Eqs. (16) and ( 17 ) are introduced into Eq. (11) , the errors of the proposed analytical solution for non-self-preserving aerosols are largely reduced, and their precision can be ensured.…”
Section: Non-self-preserving Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the PBE associated with a particle-size-dependent coagulation kernel cannot be precisely solved. Various methods for solving the PBE have been proposed in the last century, including the method of moments [6][7][8][9][10][11] , sectional method [12][13][14][15] , and Monte Carlo method [16][17][18][19] , with almost all methods belonging to the numerical solution. For the numerical solution, time-consuming iterative algorithms, such as the 4th-order Runge-Kutta method, must be performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was conducted on a single processor, however, and advances in computer processing power since then as well as the availability of moderate-size clusters at a reasonable price means that such simulations are now well within the capacity of modern computing systems. Morgan et al [163] applied a stochastic PBE to simulate the formation of silica, titania and iron oxide particles in a 1-D laminar premixed flame environment. Rosner and Pyykonen [212] coupled a two-dimensional PBE resolved by a QMOM approach with CFD to model the formation of alumina in a counterflow diffusion flame reactor.…”
Section: Soot Formation and Nanoparticle Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%