2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gmod.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new optimization approach for mass-spring models parameterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a new approach has been proposed to resolve the first problem. 20 This method just compares the results with some physical models that simulate homogeneous, linear, and isotropic material with isoparametric finite element method (FEM) techniques. As far as we know, the simulation error is still too large to meet the requirements of brain simulation accuracy.…”
Section: Deformation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a new approach has been proposed to resolve the first problem. 20 This method just compares the results with some physical models that simulate homogeneous, linear, and isotropic material with isoparametric finite element method (FEM) techniques. As far as we know, the simulation error is still too large to meet the requirements of brain simulation accuracy.…”
Section: Deformation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method has the following disadvantages: (a) that mass–spring parameters and material properties are not relevant, and (b) the instability and inaccuracy problems such as node flipping. Recently, a new approach has been proposed to resolve the first problem . This method just compares the results with some physical models that simulate homogeneous, linear, and isotropic material with isoparametric finite element method (FEM) techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the physical model is that it considers the inherent parameters of the fabric and has a strong sense of reality in the simulation (Celniker and Gossard, 1991;Breen et al, 1994;Provot, 1995;Eischen et al, 1996;Howlett and Hewitt, 1998). However, the mechanical model needs to analyze the force and establish the equation of motion point by point, involving a large number of partial differential equations, which makes the simulation process very time-consuming (Terzopoulos et al, 1987;Okabe et al, 1992;Jakobsen, 2001;Da Silva et al, 2015). The energy model must iterate multiple times to find the minimum energy that makes the physical model less real-time (Ng and Grimsdale, 1996;Eberhardt et al, 1996;Peng and Zhang, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hou et al proposed a new constraint-based finite element model for brain tissue that was implemented by introducing implicit integration and Graphics Processing Unit calculation [8]. Pereira da Silva et al proposed a new method based on data-driven parameterization of the mass-spring model to achieve object deformation [9], [10]. Tang and Wan proposed a new strain-based constrained finite element method for simulating effectively nonlinear uniform soft structures [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%