2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new option for the reconstruction of orbital floor defects with heterologous cortical bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While orthopaedic literature has limited reports of xenograft use, facial reconstruction and periodontal literature has more experience with these products [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The biology of oral and facial grafting sites differs from sites of orthopaedic pathology treated with bone grafting but it is still important to recognize the recent successes seen with xenografts and various bone graft substitutes used in treatment of facial and periodontal pathology [ 30 , 31 , 32 ] with improved patient outcomes and quality of life [ 25 , 26 ]. This literature supports further consideration in orthopaedic applications as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While orthopaedic literature has limited reports of xenograft use, facial reconstruction and periodontal literature has more experience with these products [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The biology of oral and facial grafting sites differs from sites of orthopaedic pathology treated with bone grafting but it is still important to recognize the recent successes seen with xenografts and various bone graft substitutes used in treatment of facial and periodontal pathology [ 30 , 31 , 32 ] with improved patient outcomes and quality of life [ 25 , 26 ]. This literature supports further consideration in orthopaedic applications as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although undeniable progress in the management of orbital floor fractures has occurred over the past decades, there is still a lack of broad consensus as to which material(s) should be used to restore proper anatomy of the orbital floor in order to achieve best clinical results. This is also reflected by the still very high number of recent studies describing various approaches and materials to reconstruct the orbital floor, such as titanium meshes [27], partially absorbable meshes [28], bioresorbable implants [29,30], resorbable collagen membranes [31], polydioxanone foils [32], porous polyethylene sheets [33], bioactive glass S53P4 implants [34], auricular conchal grafts [35], rib bone grafts [36], or heterologous cortical bone [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone blocks, cortical laminas, and membranes of heterologous cortical bone have been used successfully in recent years in plastic and maxillofacial surgery due to their plasticity and biocompatible structure and may be a less morbid alternative to distance block grafting. Being all of them resorbable is another advantage when compared to nonresorbable membranes and barriers [7, 8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%