“…In 2010 Buchwald used calorimetry to measure protodeboronation kinetics of a series of substituted 2,6-difluorophenyl boronic acids in a biphasic basic aqueous medium (aq K3PO4/THF).12 Perrin extended this study, including other electronegative 2,6-disubstituents, Cl, Br, and CF3,17k which led to the proposal of a new, i.e., non-Kuivila type, mechanism involving specificbasemediated protolysis (k3) of the boronate anion ([ArB-(OH)3]−). The process was reported to only occur with boronic acids bearing a substituent at both ortho-positions (i.e., 2,6-disubstitution).17k Despite the core role of heteroaromatic boronic acids in synthesis and discovery, and the propensity for many to undergo protodeboronation, during storage17i and in coupling, 8,12 there is a near-complete absence of the kinetic data requisite for their behavior to be compared and contrasted. Thus, while it is known empirically, or anecdotally, that certain heteroaromatic boronic acids are much more prone to protodeboronation than others, 1,8,11b it is not clear whether overall they behave similarly to substituted phenylboronic acids, i.e., displaying the simple acid-and base-catalyzed pH relationships (k1, k2) identified by Kuivila, or whether there are more complex pH dependencies for some classes of heteroaromatic boronic acids, for example involving heterocycle basicity, or other pathways, such as the specific-base-mediated protolysis (k3) identified by Perrin.17k Indeed, it is not even clear for an individual class of heteroaromatic boronic acid whether extremes of pH (low or high) are to be avoided, or are beneficial, in terms of stability.…”