2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new path-integral representation of the T-matrix in potential scattering

Abstract: We employ the method used by Barbashov and collaborators in Quantum Field Theory to derive a pathintegral representation of the T -matrix in nonrelativistic potential scattering which is free of functional integration over fictitious variables as was necessary before. The resulting expression serves as a starting point for a variational approximation applied to high-energy scattering from a Gaussian potential. Good agreement with exact partial-wave calculations is found even at large scattering angles. A novel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to parameters of the potential or the energy. This gave the same result as previously [3] derived from the field-theoretic work of Barbashov et al While this result is written in terms of velocity path integrals I also have succeeded to give a new representation by ordinary Feynman path integrals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…to parameters of the potential or the energy. This gave the same result as previously [3] derived from the field-theoretic work of Barbashov et al While this result is written in terms of velocity path integrals I also have succeeded to give a new representation by ordinary Feynman path integrals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This is obvious since Eqs. (12), (8) or (24), (28) come all as a "level 1" -representation [3] of the scattering amplitude where one power of the potential appears in front of the path integral whereas an impact-parameter representation would belong to the "level 0" -class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations