2014
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new PET resolution measurement method through Monte-Carlo simulations

Abstract: The thin-layer chromatography-based plane source presented requires materials commonly found in a clinical environment and could be used to assess image quality in nuclear medicine departments and to further develop PET and single-photon emission computed tomography scanners through Monte-Carlo simulations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Image quality in PET scanners is affected by a variety of parameters, including the crystal's properties, size and arrangement, the mode of operation (2D or 3D), photon noncollinearity and positron range, oblique detector penetration, photon scatter, the measured standardized uptake values (SUVs), patient motion, the position of the source within the FOV, sensitivity, and noise, all of which contribute to PET system's performance [8,40,46,[74][75][76][77]. Among the other factors affecting resolution, the most dominant is positron range, which can degrade resolution up to a few millimeters, depending the system settings, from the ideal resolution, which is defined as twice the pixel size, due to the Nyquist theorem [76,78]. Furthermore, image quality is dependent on the number of iterations and subsets in ordered subset-type algorithms, filters in FBP, and post-filtering [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image quality in PET scanners is affected by a variety of parameters, including the crystal's properties, size and arrangement, the mode of operation (2D or 3D), photon noncollinearity and positron range, oblique detector penetration, photon scatter, the measured standardized uptake values (SUVs), patient motion, the position of the source within the FOV, sensitivity, and noise, all of which contribute to PET system's performance [8,40,46,[74][75][76][77]. Among the other factors affecting resolution, the most dominant is positron range, which can degrade resolution up to a few millimeters, depending the system settings, from the ideal resolution, which is defined as twice the pixel size, due to the Nyquist theorem [76,78]. Furthermore, image quality is dependent on the number of iterations and subsets in ordered subset-type algorithms, filters in FBP, and post-filtering [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modulation transfer function (MTF) was measured by irradiating a PTW Freiburg tungsten edge test device, following the procedures described in the IEC standard [11,32,33]. The updated IEC 62220-1-1:2015 [11,33,40] standard describes certain modifications, such as the method for the determination of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in which the final MTF can be now obtained only through averaging of the oversampled edge spread function (ESF) [33,[41][42][43]. The average of all oversampled ESFs was then fitted with a modified Fermi-Dirac distribution function as follows [11,21]:…”
Section: Modulation Transfer Function (Mtf)mentioning
confidence: 99%