2021
DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Philosophy for the Margin of Appreciation and European Consensus

Abstract: The article advances an anti-foundationalist account of the key doctrines of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR): the margin of appreciation (MoA) and European consensus (EuC). The first part of the article argues that anti-foundationalism, which understands the existence of human rights as ultimately dependent on social practices and their justification as based on a plurality of values, is a credible conception of human rights grounds. The second part contends that anti-foundationalism offers the best… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…104-1-5). Tripkovic (2022) argued that the adaptation of the doctrine of the Margin of Appreciation for the Strasbourg Court should be applauded because the doctrine makes the application of the ECHR ‗context-sensitive' in a pluralistic Europe where ‗domestic understanding of human rights' norms needed to be mainstreamed into norm interpretation and application (Tripkovic, 2022, p. 234). Its application was originally in the context of derogation (Lavrysen, 2018; A and Others v. UK 7 ), and limitations of rights (Bakircioglu, 2007;Kratochvíl, 2011) but has now evolved into an interpretative technique employed for expanding the substantive and procedural obligations of ECHR (Arnardottir, 2014;Skinner, 2014) as a living instrument (Bratza, 2014).…”
Section: The Doctrine Of the Margin Of Appreciation And The Echrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…104-1-5). Tripkovic (2022) argued that the adaptation of the doctrine of the Margin of Appreciation for the Strasbourg Court should be applauded because the doctrine makes the application of the ECHR ‗context-sensitive' in a pluralistic Europe where ‗domestic understanding of human rights' norms needed to be mainstreamed into norm interpretation and application (Tripkovic, 2022, p. 234). Its application was originally in the context of derogation (Lavrysen, 2018; A and Others v. UK 7 ), and limitations of rights (Bakircioglu, 2007;Kratochvíl, 2011) but has now evolved into an interpretative technique employed for expanding the substantive and procedural obligations of ECHR (Arnardottir, 2014;Skinner, 2014) as a living instrument (Bratza, 2014).…”
Section: The Doctrine Of the Margin Of Appreciation And The Echrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…104-1-5). Tripkovic (2022) argued that the adaptation of the doctrine of the Margin of Appreciation for the Strasbourg Court should be applauded because the doctrine makes the application of the ECHR ‗context-sensitive' in a pluralistic Europe where ‗domestic understanding of human rights' norms needed to be mainstreamed into norm interpretation and application (Tripkovic, 2022, p. 234). Its application was originally in the context of derogation (Lavrysen, 2018; A and Others v. UK 7 ), and limitations of rights (Bakircioglu, 2007;Kratochvíl, 2011) but has now evolved into an interpretative technique employed for expanding the substantive and procedural obligations of ECHR (Arnardottir, 2014;Skinner, 2014) as a living instrument (Bratza, 2014).…”
Section: The Doctrine Of the Margin Of Appreciation And The Echrmentioning
confidence: 99%