2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new predictive model for FRCM-confined columns: A reflection on the composite behavior at peak stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, design codes and guidelines do not allow the use of FRP confinement for members featuring a side aspect ratio greater than a certain limit (see Ref. [ 43 ]). The ACI 440.2R-17 guidelines [ 31 ] do not recommend using FRP wrapping for RC columns with a sectional aspect ratio greater than 2.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, design codes and guidelines do not allow the use of FRP confinement for members featuring a side aspect ratio greater than a certain limit (see Ref. [ 43 ]). The ACI 440.2R-17 guidelines [ 31 ] do not recommend using FRP wrapping for RC columns with a sectional aspect ratio greater than 2.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, low-quality matrix does not allow for the performance of the fibers to develop if they are prematurely exposed, and the stress is poorly transferred to the fibers when a crack opens within the matrix. Some of the cited parameters have been the variables of experimental programs (e.g., column shape and performance of masonry; fibers, matrix behavior, strength, amount, to cite some examples [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]) and they have been included in available theoretical confinement models for confined members with FRP or FRCM (see [24,25,37] for a review). Unfortunately, such theoretical models are still not able to simulate all the experimental variability found in the cited programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One previous study proposed a peak axial stress formula for concrete cylinders that considers variables such as the type of concrete cylinder cross-section (round, square), size, strength of concrete, and type of fibers [21]. However, the peak axial stress formula is limited to the evaluation of material properties, and applicability to actual size RC columns is minimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%