1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00081-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new probability formula for surveys to substantiate freedom from disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
221
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
221
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, if the sensitivity of a test is low a bigger sample would be required. According to the ELISA manufacturer, the specificity of the cELISA is 100%, while sensitivity is 96.47%, if we use the EpiTools software (Cameron & Baldock 1998) to determine the size sample considering the sensitivity and specificity of the method described above, and with a population size of 13110, a SVB prevalence of 0.05, and a type I and II error of 0.05, the total animals to be sampled would be 61 bovines. Even though the bovine population is increased, the number of animals to be sampled is the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if the sensitivity of a test is low a bigger sample would be required. According to the ELISA manufacturer, the specificity of the cELISA is 100%, while sensitivity is 96.47%, if we use the EpiTools software (Cameron & Baldock 1998) to determine the size sample considering the sensitivity and specificity of the method described above, and with a population size of 13110, a SVB prevalence of 0.05, and a type I and II error of 0.05, the total animals to be sampled would be 61 bovines. Even though the bovine population is increased, the number of animals to be sampled is the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we applied the changes suggested by Kriger et al (2006), ran all samples in duplicate and always added three standards reactions containing DNA from 100, 10, 1, and 0.1 Bd genome equivalents and a negative control. To calculate the probability of freedom from disease for the amphibian populations at the Kirchfeld study area, we used FreeCalc software (Cameron & Baldock 1998), assuming a population prevalence of 5 % (as found in other Austrian populations, Sztatecsny unpubl. ), and a test sensitivity of 97 % (Hyatt et al 2007).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point has been studied in the veterinary field for a number of years [20] and computer programs are now available to evaluate the "herd" diagnostic value for all the cases observed [10,11,13].…”
Section: Sensitivity and Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, specific computer software may be indispensable (e.g. the FreeCalc program [10,11]). Note that the average herd-level sensitivity will be p. Table IV.…”
Section: Determining How Many Animals Are To Be Studied In Each Herdmentioning
confidence: 99%