2020
DOI: 10.7554/elife.55320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new protocol for single-cell RNA-seq reveals stochastic gene expression during lag phase in budding yeast

Abstract: Current methods for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of yeast cells do not match the throughput and relative simplicity of the state-of-the-art techniques that are available for mammalian cells. In this study, we report how 10x Genomics’ droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing technology can be modified to allow analysis of yeast cells. The protocol, which is based on in-droplet spheroplasting of the cells, yields an order-of-magnitude higher throughput in comparison to existing methods. After extensive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chlamydomonas cells, just like yeast cells, can present a significant cell wall that might be considered a physical barrier for RNA extraction from single cells. In yeast, this technical limitation was resolved by adding the cell wall digesting enzyme zymolyase before (Jackson et al, 2020) or during (Jariani et al, 2020) the reverse transcription step of the same 10X Chromium Single Cell 30 v2 protocol we followed here. However, it should be noted that the authors did not attempt to generate scRNA-seq libraries from walled (undigested) yeast cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlamydomonas cells, just like yeast cells, can present a significant cell wall that might be considered a physical barrier for RNA extraction from single cells. In yeast, this technical limitation was resolved by adding the cell wall digesting enzyme zymolyase before (Jackson et al, 2020) or during (Jariani et al, 2020) the reverse transcription step of the same 10X Chromium Single Cell 30 v2 protocol we followed here. However, it should be noted that the authors did not attempt to generate scRNA-seq libraries from walled (undigested) yeast cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study also provides a unifying context for the interpretation of classic and recent reports of coincident recombination in yeasts, in mammalian experimental systems, and in human disease. The combination of whole genome analyses, modern lineage tracing and single cell transcriptomic approaches (50,51), and the double LOH selection approach described here offer a powerful experimental platform to further dissect the core mechanisms responsible for the SGI phenomenon.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Underlying Sgimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-cell data is undersampled and noisy, but large numbers of observations are collected in parallel and count data derived from unique molecular identifiers have some intrinsic advantages. In order to quantitatively evaluate network inference performance, we apply the Inferelator to Saccharomyces cerevisiae single-cell expression data [22, 47], and score the model performance based on a previously-defined yeast gold standard [40]. This data is split into 15 separate tasks, based on labels that correspond to experimental conditions from the original works (Figure 4A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%