2017
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new push‐pull sample design for microscale mode 1 fracture toughness measurements under uniaxial tension

Abstract: A sample geometry is proposed for performing microscale tensile experiments based on a push‐pull design. It allows measuring mode 1 fracture toughness under uniform far‐field loading. Finite element simulations were performed to determine the geometry factor, which was nearly constant for Young's moduli spanning 2 orders of magnitude. It was further verified that mode 1 stress intensity factor KI is nearly constant over the width of the tension rods and an order of magnitude higher than KII and KIII. Notched s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, KI is even at a bending displacement of up to 1 µm more than one order of magnitude larger than KII and KIII. A similar relation was found for a recently presented geometry for fracture toughness measurements under uniaxial tension [73]. Secondly, the off-plane shearing (mode III) is in the first approximation zero, because of the symmetric loading condition.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Firstly, KI is even at a bending displacement of up to 1 µm more than one order of magnitude larger than KII and KIII. A similar relation was found for a recently presented geometry for fracture toughness measurements under uniaxial tension [73]. Secondly, the off-plane shearing (mode III) is in the first approximation zero, because of the symmetric loading condition.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The toughness values obtained from small-scale experiments in various geometries, including clamped beams, cantilevers, pillar splitting, double cantilevers loaded by compression loading, and wedge loading, have been validated against bulk experiments, yielding confidence that small-scale experiments and FIB precracking are reliable (29) (Figure 17). Two studies argued (174,175) that fatigue precracking in compression was necessary to obtain reliable toughness data and that FIB-milled notches overestimated the numbers. A topic that has attracted recent interest is the temperature-dependent ductile-brittle transition in silicon, which is similarly size sensitive ( 14) as for grain size in steel, due to the stress concentrating effects of slip bands in the Cottrell model.…”
Section: Fracture: Brittle Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%