2019
DOI: 10.1101/722397
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new QRS detector stress test combining temporal jitter and F-score (JF) reveals significant performance differences amongst popular detectors

Abstract: The R peak detection of an ECG signal is the basis of virtually any further processing and any error caused by this detection will propagate to further processing stages. Despite this, R peak detection algorithms and annotated databases often allow large error tolerances around 10%, masking any error introduced. In this paper we have revisited popular ECG R peak detection algorithms by applying sample precision error margins. For this purpose we have created a new open access ECG database with sample precision… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results may be limited to the size of test dataset. In our future work, we plan to further validate the proposed method with a publicly available ECG database recently published by Porr and Howell [27]. This database contains noisy ECG signals where noise originates from the real life activities like walking or jogging.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current results may be limited to the size of test dataset. In our future work, we plan to further validate the proposed method with a publicly available ECG database recently published by Porr and Howell [27]. This database contains noisy ECG signals where noise originates from the real life activities like walking or jogging.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those methods are usually lightweight and could be implemented on embedded devices. However, these algorithms often only perform well with relatively clean ECG signals but are not robust enough to noises and artifacts [7,26,27]. On the other hand, the signal quality could vary over time, particularly in wearable devices, due to motions, electrode-skin conductance changes, or the use of dry electrodes [18,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed earlier, the obtained performance of the proposed algorithm is the most efficient when the parameter µ is chosen as 0.02, α is 0.7 and the filter order is 5. The proposed algorithm's performance will be tested on the ECG stress test signals of the Glasgow University Database (GUDB) [10]. This database includes 125 ECG signal records collected from 25 subjects with five different tasks (sitting, math test, hand-bike, walking, and jogging on a treadmill).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the extracted R − S peak values from an ECG signal. By extracting these data under stress and without stress, the ECG can be accurately analyzed [ 22 ]. R peak and S peak were extracted from ECG signals after setting a threshold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%