2011
DOI: 10.1002/met.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new radar‐based storm identification and warning technique

Abstract: ABSTRACT:A new storm identification and warning technique is proposed which exclusively uses radar data as input. The new identification method assembles contiguous storm points to constitute 2D storm components and improve the vertical association of storm components to construct 3D storms, which can overcome the deficiencies existing in traditional identification methods. Based on the evolution properties and characteristic distributions, strong storms and general storms are specified to train support vector… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are interested in predicting thunderstorm impacts at the hourly scale, with a resolution of a few kilometres: a thunderstorm will be deemed to occur if a lightning strike is observed within 10 km and 30 min of the observation, or the maximum radar reflectivity in this neighbourhood is greater than 35dBZ (this threshold is commonly used for radar thunderstorm detection; see Li et al (2012) and references therein). This criterion is applied at all full hours and on each point of a regular latitude-longitude grid of 20 km mesh, in order to generate a set of pseudo-observations.…”
Section: Thunderstorm Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are interested in predicting thunderstorm impacts at the hourly scale, with a resolution of a few kilometres: a thunderstorm will be deemed to occur if a lightning strike is observed within 10 km and 30 min of the observation, or the maximum radar reflectivity in this neighbourhood is greater than 35dBZ (this threshold is commonly used for radar thunderstorm detection; see Li et al (2012) and references therein). This criterion is applied at all full hours and on each point of a regular latitude-longitude grid of 20 km mesh, in order to generate a set of pseudo-observations.…”
Section: Thunderstorm Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, VIL was not considered in this study, although many severity algorithms apply it (e.g. Winston and Ruthi, ; Joe et al , ; Hering et al , ; Li et al , ). VIL is not commonly used in the operational radar production in Finland because the melting layer bright band often interferes with VIL estimation in this climate.…”
Section: Data Sources and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A straightforward radar‐based severity ranking method is also included in the Thunderstorm Radar Tracking system, which is used operationally in Switzerland (Hering et al , ; Rotach et al , ). In a recent work, Li et al use a trained support vector machine with radar‐derived VIL, echo‐top altitude, maximum vertical reflectivity and storm centroid height to classify ‘strong’ and ‘general’ storms in Nanjing, China. Many of the above‐mentioned methods have proven their ability to identify significant convective weather in real time, which is crucial, for example, in operational forecasting applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to forecasting longevity comes from algorithms such as the Thunderstorm Identification, Tracking, Analysis, and Nowcasting system (TITAN; Dixon and Wiener 1993;Li et al 2012;Wolfson et al 1994). Both Li et al (2012) and Wolfson et al (1994) use machine learning (ML) to automate part of the tracking and identification process, but neither uses ML to predict storm longevity. MacKeen et al (1999) is most related to our work, as they use linear regression to predict storm longevity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%