1999
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46796-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Representation of Boolean Functions

Abstract: Abstract. We study a representation of Boolean functions (and more generally of integer-valued / complex-valued functions), not used until now in coding and cryptography, which yields more information than the currently known representations, on the combinatorial, spectral and cryptographic properties of the functions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…for all ð1; y; 1ÞauAU: Theorem 1.1 is a combination of Proposition 1 of [4] and a result of [3]. A binary function f AFðF n 2 ; F 2 Þ is called t-resilient if fðcÞ ¼ 0 for all cAF n 2 with jcjpt:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for all ð1; y; 1ÞauAU: Theorem 1.1 is a combination of Proposition 1 of [4] and a result of [3]. A binary function f AFðF n 2 ; F 2 Þ is called t-resilient if fðcÞ ¼ 0 for all cAF n 2 with jcjpt:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Theorem 1.2 is not explicitly stated in the literature. However, it follows from the results of[3] and is thus considered known. A binary function f AFðF n 2 ; F 2 Þ is called bent iffðcÞ ¼ 72 n=2 for all cAF n 2 : (n must be even.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…See for example, [10,[12][13][14][15][17][18][19][20][37][38][39][40]67,71]. Non-Boolean functions have also important applications in cryptography [8,9,64], sequences [57,68] and coding theory [43,69], but they have been less studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then there exist U, W < (F 2 ) m such that dim(U ) = dim(W ) = m − 1 and U γ = W . As the non-linearity of a vectorial Boolean function is affine invariant (see for instance [12]), without loss of generality, we may assume U = W = ⟨e 1 , . .…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%