A new resource for Finnic languages

Rozhanskiy, Fedor; Markus, Elena

doi:10.33341/uh.85039

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Though, most likely they shifted to a convergent variety, as suggested by Fedor Rozhanskiy (p.c. 20 August 2015; more about this variety in Rozhanskiy & Markus 2013: 230;2014). According to Rozhanskiy, the women were mostly from Soikkola, and, of course, the Ingrian spoken in the Lower Luga area is not the Soikkola variety.…”

Section: 7mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9. On receptive multilingualism in contemporary Finnish-Estonian interaction see Härmävaara (2013;2014;2017;forthcoming). However, in spite of the studied languages being closely related, the situation of Finns and Estonians brought up in 1 0 5…”

Section: Plurilingualism and Receptive Multilingualismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Laanest divides the words of these groups into those found in 1) Vote and Finnish (and usually Ingrian as well) but not in Estonian and into those found in 2) Vote and Esto nian but not in Finnish. For example, in the Lower Luga area, Ingrian has a Vote substrate and the local Finnish dialect has both a Vote and Ingrian substrate (Savijärvi 1998: 274;2001: 165;Muslimov 2005;Rozhanskiy & Markus 2014). According to Kuznetsova et al (2015: 133), all the Finnish varieties of western Ingria, except the dialects in Kaprio and Tyrö, have substrate vocabulary from Vote.…”

Section: Are There Vote Loanwords In Both Ingrian and Estonian?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Mutual contacts and lexical relations among the Finnic varieties of western Ingria and northeastern Estonia

Björklöf

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this article is 1) to describe the historical language contact situation between the genetically closely related Finnic varieties of western Ingria, 2) to give examples of the numerous loanwords originating from mutual contacts among local Finnic varieties as well as areal diffusion, and 3) to discuss the method of investigating contacts and borrowing among closely related varieties. The data are taken from old dialectal materials published in vocabularies and dictionaries as well as preserved in archives. The words that are analysed and discussed etymologically in more detail are drawn from Vote, Ingrian, and Estonian. Although it is often difficult to confirm the direction of borrowing among closely related varieties, I seek to determine the direction of diffusion in the varieties whose development cannot be described merely in terms of a traditional binary family tree model. Examples of mutual borrowing between Vote, Ingrian, Estonian, and Finnish are presented. Estonian loanwords in Vote and Ingrian can usually be recognised by their distribution. Most vocabulary originating as loans (in Vote, Ingrian, and Estonian) has been borrowed from Finnish. Loans in both Vote and Estonian often have a distribution not only in Ingrian but also in Finnish. Because of the phonetic similarity of these varieties, the donor variety usually cannot be defined. Vote loanwords occur only sporadically in Ingrian and Estonian: they may also form a substratum. The speakers of Finnic varieties in western Ingria used to live in old rural communities with long-term multilingualism, villages with a mixed population, and vague language boundaries. The arrival of new inhabitants from the countries, which ruled this area and the foundation of St. Petersburg in 1703 changed the ethnographic balance between different peoples in Ingria. This increased linguistic diversity and altered the hierarchy of the languages leading gradually to accelerating language and identity shift of the local peoples of Ingria.

show abstract

Section: 7mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Plurilingualism and Receptive Multilingualismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Are There Vote Loanwords In Both Ingrian and Estonian?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mutual contacts and lexical relations among the Finnic varieties of western Ingria and northeastern Estonia

Björklöf

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… See Kuznetsova (2009: 19) on the dialectal zones of the Soikkola peninsula. 7 See details of the project inRozhanskiy & Markus (2019). 8 The village names in Table1and Figure1correspond to the way they are attested in our field recordings but spelled according to the Finnish tradition with ü rendered as y and š/ž rendered as s/z.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Functions of demonstrative pronouns in contemporary Soikkola Ingrian

Markus,

Rozhanskiy

2023

ESUKA-JEFUL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses demonstrative pronouns in the Soikkola dialect of the Ingrian language. The material for the research comes from the collection of spontaneous speech samples recorded in the 21st century. All the examples are published for the first time. The article presents mainly a qualitative analysis and aims at overviewing the basic functions of the Ingrian demonstrative pronouns tämä and še. It is shown that in the contemporary Ingrian the demonstratives are used as deictic and anaphoric devices, and also as discourse markers. Individual speakers demonstrate differences in the use of these pronouns due to the contact influence from the neighbouring languages. Kokkuvõte. Elena Markus, Fedor Rozhanskiy: Demonstratiivpronoomenite funktsioonid tänapäeva isuri keele Soikkola murdes. Käesolevas artiklis käsitletakse demonstratiivpronoomeneid isuri keele Soikkola murdes. Uurimuse materjal pärineb 21. sajandil salvestatud spontaanse kõne näidiste kogust. Kõik näited avaldatakse esimest korda. Artiklis esitatakse peamiselt kvalitatiivne analüüs ja selle eesmärk on anda ülevaade isuri demonstratiivpronoomenite tämä ja še põhifunktsioonidest. Näidatakse, et tänapäeva isuri keeles kasutatakse demonstratiive deiktiliste ja anafoorsete vahenditena ning ka diskursuse markeritena. Üksikutel kõnelejatel esineb nende asesõnade kasutamisel erinevusi naaberkeelte kontaktmõju tõttu.

show abstract

A new resource for Finnic languages

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Mutual contacts and lexical relations among the Finnic varieties of western Ingria and northeastern Estonia

Mutual contacts and lexical relations among the Finnic varieties of western Ingria and northeastern Estonia

Functions of demonstrative pronouns in contemporary Soikkola Ingrian

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About