1992
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.66.6.3725-3732.1992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new retrovirus packaging cell for gene transfer constructed from amplified long terminal repeat-free chimeric proviral genes

Abstract: The retroviral gene transfer system is a powerful tool for somatic gene therapy. A retroviral stock with a high viral titer and lacking replication-competent virus (RCV) is desirable for this type of gene transfer. To fulfill these requirements, we made a new packaging cell line, designated ampli-GPE. To reduce the homology between proviral DNA in the packaging cell and retroviral vector, the gag-pol and env genes of Moloney murine leukemia virus were separated onto two different plasmids, pGP-KV and pENV-KV, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of improved packaging cell lines which yield higher viral titers or pseudotyped particles for a variety of specific purposes have been constructed (5,14,20,25). All of these are based on the safety concept of split function to minimize the chances of producing replication-competent viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of improved packaging cell lines which yield higher viral titers or pseudotyped particles for a variety of specific purposes have been constructed (5,14,20,25). All of these are based on the safety concept of split function to minimize the chances of producing replication-competent viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stable producer cell lines, however, have several major drawbacks: vector titers generated by them are generally too low to allow an efficient in vivo gene transfer, they may evolve to produce recombinant retroviral particles, and they are most suitable to provide vectors in vitro. Alternative improvements to overcome some of these limitations have been described previously, all of them based on the use of transient retroviral vector production systems (4,8,12,21,27,36,38,40). Although these systems differ in several respects, a common shared feature is that the retroviral packaging and vector components are introduced into cells by transfection procedures, thus limiting the efficiency of these new strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%