2021
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new rhinoceros clade from the Pleistocene of Asia sheds light on mammal dispersals to the Philippines

Abstract: Rhinoceroses are among the most endangered mammalian species today. Their past diversity is well documented from the Eocene onward, although their evolutionary history is far from being fully understood. Here, we elucidate the systematic affinities of a Pleistocene rhinoceros species represented by a partial skeleton from 709 ± 68 kya archaeological deposits in Luzon Island, Philippines. We perform a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, including all living species and a wide array of extinct rhinocerotid spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is via NEA through Taiwan, in parallel with the Neolithic expansion into ISEA and Oceania, and the other is via Southeast Asia, particularly from the Indochinese Peninsula via the Sundaic Region (Sundaland) to Palawan and Sulu Archipelago, which spread to the rest of the Philippine islands since prehistoric times. The latter could be consistent with the previously suggested north to south dispersal pattern ( Koenigswald, 1956 ; Arenas et al, 2020 ; Antoine et al, 2021 ), while the former might agree the dispersal routes proposed by ( Porr et al, 2012 ; Mijares, 2014 ; Louys et al, 2018 ; Arenas et al, 2020 ). Despite geographic barriers to migration, these animals have been able to expand their range across the various islands of the Philippines, and variation in morphological patterns has evolved among these populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One is via NEA through Taiwan, in parallel with the Neolithic expansion into ISEA and Oceania, and the other is via Southeast Asia, particularly from the Indochinese Peninsula via the Sundaic Region (Sundaland) to Palawan and Sulu Archipelago, which spread to the rest of the Philippine islands since prehistoric times. The latter could be consistent with the previously suggested north to south dispersal pattern ( Koenigswald, 1956 ; Arenas et al, 2020 ; Antoine et al, 2021 ), while the former might agree the dispersal routes proposed by ( Porr et al, 2012 ; Mijares, 2014 ; Louys et al, 2018 ; Arenas et al, 2020 ). Despite geographic barriers to migration, these animals have been able to expand their range across the various islands of the Philippines, and variation in morphological patterns has evolved among these populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Character distribution at each node and corresponding indices are detailed in S2. Suprageneric relationships within Rhinocerotinae are consistent with those proposed by Antoine (2002, Antoine et al (2010Antoine et al ( , 2022, Becker et al (2013), and Pandolfi et al (2021: Plesiaceratherium mirallesi is the earliest offshoot among Rhinocerotinae (node 1; 26 unambiguous synapomorphies; Bremer Support [BS] > 5). Aceratheriini (node 3; nine unambiguous synapomorphies; BS = 2) and Rhinocerotini (node 5; eight unambiguous synapomorphies; BS = 2) are sister clades (node 2; 13 unambiguous synapomorphies; BS = 4).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Aside from the outgroup, we have included a branching group (Antoine, 2002, 2003; Orliac et al, 2010; Boivin et al, 2019), consisting of 12 species classically assigned to all suprageneric groups but Teleoceratina among Rhinocerotinae, and aimed at i) further testing the monophyly of the in-group and ii) replacing it among Rhinocerotinae. The branching group includes an early-diverging representative of Rhinocerotinae ( Plesiaceratherium mirallesi (Crusafont, Villalta & Truyols, 1955)), three species among Aceratheriini ( Aceratherium incisivum Kaup, 1832, Acerorhinus zernowi (Borissiak, 1914), and Alicornops simorrense (Lartet, 1851)), and eight members of the Rhinocerotina, encompassing all five living rhinoceroses, namely the Indian rhino ( Rhinoceros unicornis Linnaeus, 1758), the Javan rhino ( Rhinoceros sondaicus Desmarest, 1822), the Sumatran rhino ( Dicerorhinus sumatrensis (Fischer, 1814)), the white rhino ( Ceratotherium simum (Burchell, 1817)), and the black rhino ( Diceros bicornis (Linnaeus, 1758)), but also three fossil species: Lartetotherium sansaniense (Miocene of Europe; Heissig, 2012), Gaindatherium browni Colbert, 1934 (Miocene of South Asia; Heissig, 1972 ; Antoine, in press), and Nesorhinu s philippinensis (Von Koenigswald, 1956) (early Middle Pleistocene of the Philippines; Antoine et al, 2022 and references therein).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). To date, the relationships between the five modern taxa remain controversial, especially regarding the position of the Sumatran rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) and its extinct relatives (e.g., Tougard et al, 2001;Orlando et al, 2003;Fernando et al, 2006;Price & Bininda-Emonds, 2009;Steiner & Ryder, 2011;Yuan et al, 2014;Welker et al, 2017;Cappellini et al, 2019;Antoine et al, 2021). These uncertainties are likely due to a hard polytomy at the base of the crown-group containing the five modern species (Willerslev et al, 2009;Gaudry, 2017).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%