1994
DOI: 10.1002/jab.770050413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new saw technique improves preparation of bone sections for light and electron microscopy

Abstract: A newly developed saw technique was developed to produce sections circa 10 microns or thicker from fresh bone or dentine and from plastic embedded undecalcified bone tissue with or without implant materials. The method comprises only one step because grinding or polishing to make the sections thinner is not necessary. The bone slices can be decalcified rapidly without using aggressive solvents and used for making ultrathin sections for electron microscopy. Sections of fresh dentine of 15 to 30 microns are tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereafter, tissue blocks were dehydrated in an ethanol series and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Longitudinal mid-implant histological sections with a thickness of 10-15 m were made on a modified inner-lock histological diamond saw (Leiden Microtome Cutting System, Leiden, NL) 32 and stained with 0.3% basic fuchsine and 1.0% methylene blue, pH 8.5.…”
Section: Tissue Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, tissue blocks were dehydrated in an ethanol series and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Longitudinal mid-implant histological sections with a thickness of 10-15 m were made on a modified inner-lock histological diamond saw (Leiden Microtome Cutting System, Leiden, NL) 32 and stained with 0.3% basic fuchsine and 1.0% methylene blue, pH 8.5.…”
Section: Tissue Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strategy to achieve this goal is to precoat implants with cell adhesion molecules. Fibroblast adhesion to metal implants with and without pretreatment of the implants with various cell adhesion molecules has been well documented [Cannas et al, 1988;Curtis and Forrester, 1984;Dejana et al, 1987;Guy et al, 1993;Hayman et al, 1985;Hughes et al, 1993;Hynes, 1992;Klein et al, 1994;Kornu et al, 1996;Lowenberg et al, 1988;Michaels et al, 1991]. Similarly, a number of studies have revealed how osteoblast adhesion to implants influences osseointegration [Kornu et al, 1996;Puleo et al, 1991;Shah et al, 1999;Sinha et al, 1994;Vrouwenvelder et al, 1993].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical section method was applied as has been previously described [20][21][22] and unbiased estimates of the parameters were obtained. The sections were spaced 425 µm apart and were cut in one step on a newly developed microtome (KDG 95 microtome; Ignition, Bilthoven, The Netherlands) 23 Diagram of the implant device showing a hollow anchorage screw with a spring (1) and a piston (2) on which the test implant (3) is mounted. An ultra-highmolecular-weight-polyethylene plug (PE) (4) projects above the surface of the articular cartilage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%